Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="FitzTheRuke" data-source="post: 9439968" data-attributes="member: 59816">What do you see as the difference from the last playtest? I'm not seeing anything of note.I have heard people use it that way. It just IME causes confusion with there actually being a &quot;Round Zero&quot; Surprise Round, so it's best not to use that terminology - 5e specifically got rid of it for a reason. It's just round one. You said &quot;no Surprise Round&quot; in 2024 as if it were a change from THE PLAYTEST, which it isn't - it's not even a change from 2014. But I understand what you meant by it now, but I don't think that &quot;Surprise Round&quot; is so widely used to mean &quot;Round 1 with Surprise&quot; that I should have understood that from what you wrote.That honestly sounds more &quot;Well, technically...&quot; to me than what I wrote. I honestly didn't want to argue with you.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="FitzTheRuke, post: 9439968, member: 59816"] What do you see as the difference from the last playtest? I'm not seeing anything of note. I [I]have[/I] heard people use it that way. It just IME causes confusion with there actually being a "Round Zero" Surprise Round, so it's best not to use that terminology - 5e specifically got rid of it for a reason. It's just round one. You said "no Surprise Round" in 2024 as if it were a change from THE PLAYTEST, which it isn't - it's not even a change from 2014. But I understand what you meant by it [I]now[/I], but I don't think that "Surprise Round" is so widely used to mean "Round 1 with Surprise" that I should have understood that from what you wrote. That honestly sounds [I]more[/I] "Well, [I]technically[/I]..." to me than what I wrote. I honestly didn't want to argue with you. [/QUOTE]

Verification