Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D 3.0/3.5 <> earlier eds. re : min-maxing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="scourger" data-source="post: 1867214" data-attributes="member: 12328"><p><strong>equalled or exceeded</strong></p><p></p><p>I chose the last option, and I was surprised to see so many other votes for it as well. I find nothing wrong with a little min/maxing. I even read somewhere that a little bit of it is good and shows a player is interested in the character. Editions prior to 3.0 were just less balanced as I recall. As noted above, certain initial choices were better; at least in the front-end of character's life which was where most games (that I played) ended anyway.</p><p></p><p>Even in basic D&D, I don't remember a lot of humans for one reason: no infravision. For a game mostly about dungeon crawling, the ability to see in the dark is very significant.</p><p></p><p>In addition to infravision, 1e saw the debut of the elf as the favored race of D&D. </p><p></p><p>2e continued these ideas, but I only found it manageable when restricted to its core. The problem I had with munchkinism in 2e was with the brown books, starting with The Complete Fighter's Handbook. The options for player characters piled on, but the foes were not similarly advanced in power. The whole Player's Option, Skills & Tactics, etc. series pushed the envelope even farther. Thankfully, I rarely played and never DMed the game using those books. A core 2e game is great for running printed adventures. </p><p></p><p>3.0 is much more balanced. Choosing one thing for a character means foregoing something else, and the foes get the same choices as the heroes. Even so, I kept the game restricted as much to its core as possible. All the players need is the PHB. I found nothing that I wanted to change, and I did not feel the need to add anything for a core fantasy game. I did enjoy playing d20 games in other, non-sword-&-sorcery fantasy genres, but kept them to their core books also. </p><p></p><p>3.5 is basically as good for me as 3.0. I don't like some of the changes. I find myself trying to make certain things in 3.5 work like they did in 3.0 (like DR), but I do play it and DM it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="scourger, post: 1867214, member: 12328"] [b]equalled or exceeded[/b] I chose the last option, and I was surprised to see so many other votes for it as well. I find nothing wrong with a little min/maxing. I even read somewhere that a little bit of it is good and shows a player is interested in the character. Editions prior to 3.0 were just less balanced as I recall. As noted above, certain initial choices were better; at least in the front-end of character's life which was where most games (that I played) ended anyway. Even in basic D&D, I don't remember a lot of humans for one reason: no infravision. For a game mostly about dungeon crawling, the ability to see in the dark is very significant. In addition to infravision, 1e saw the debut of the elf as the favored race of D&D. 2e continued these ideas, but I only found it manageable when restricted to its core. The problem I had with munchkinism in 2e was with the brown books, starting with The Complete Fighter's Handbook. The options for player characters piled on, but the foes were not similarly advanced in power. The whole Player's Option, Skills & Tactics, etc. series pushed the envelope even farther. Thankfully, I rarely played and never DMed the game using those books. A core 2e game is great for running printed adventures. 3.0 is much more balanced. Choosing one thing for a character means foregoing something else, and the foes get the same choices as the heroes. Even so, I kept the game restricted as much to its core as possible. All the players need is the PHB. I found nothing that I wanted to change, and I did not feel the need to add anything for a core fantasy game. I did enjoy playing d20 games in other, non-sword-&-sorcery fantasy genres, but kept them to their core books also. 3.5 is basically as good for me as 3.0. I don't like some of the changes. I find myself trying to make certain things in 3.5 work like they did in 3.0 (like DR), but I do play it and DM it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D 3.0/3.5 <> earlier eds. re : min-maxing
Top