Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 6413642" data-attributes="member: 71571">Prove it.  Find the errata'd version of that power, and show the MRP of that power, including the power block that it uses, with its keywords.  You keep saying it's a power, and the only way to settle it is to show the printing of that power.  Someone else did in this thread, and instead it shows as an effect--a secondary attack from the original power use. You're almost right--attacks are the EFFECTS of using a power.  A power's effects are not restricted to a single round, however.  You're right--that attack IS the result of using that power.  But the power was used in a previous round--you're now using an action the power gives you to use the attack the power gives you.  You're not using some other power or a new power unless the effect is to grant you access to a new power.That's why I said to contrast to the Warden's forms, because they are templated exactly to work the way you think this power is--they ARE daily powers that give you access to a secondary power--but notice how those powers have their own statblock, their own keywords, and using those are distinct powers.Barbarian rage powers, however, do not follow that template.But as I said--you claim this power is now granting a secondary power.  Show me.  Copy that power in here, and show me the Rage keyword on that power.</blockquote>