Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scribble" data-source="post: 4328946" data-attributes="member: 23977">What did your feelings get hurt? Ok, great they thought it would have more use durring play, but now it doesn't appear that it will to you.I make the descision to buy things based on whether or not I can use it. I don't base it on what they said they wanted it to be in the past. I can see a use for a searchable index of powers, abilities, classes, feats, rituals, etc. If you don't feel the tool is useful to YOU that's your right, but to say the tool will be absolutely useless because you can't use it at YOUR table?AgainI think it would be cool to have a resource for those things, which is why I'm hoping they haven't scrapped the encounter builder.I can also see why they would keep that stuff seperate from the index of feats and powers and such. DM's need that stuff too man.  I'm building an adventure and I want a ritual that does X. Or to give an NPC a certain type of power, or to give out a certain magic item...If I disgust you so much, stop posting to me? You have a way of coming off very insulting my man. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />Sure, there can be features that would make it even more useful. If they're added, that would be awesome. All I'm arguing is that I feel it's already useful, and saying it's useless in my opinion is a bit overdramatic.It would be awesome and extra helpful if they also added the base rules, but I can also understand their decision not to, and feel that even if they're not in there, the tool is still useful. If that disgusts you? That's your issue, not mine. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

Verification