Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D 5th Edition!!! (WITH POLL!!!)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 5584673" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>I'm not at all sure about that. It seems some pretty maladaptive ideas, that the designers knew were maladaptive at the beginning of the process, have flourished (long combat time, I'm looking at you).</p><p></p><p>It would be cool (for some) if that evolutionary metaphor really worked -- then you could say that what you liked was objectively better (if newer). I, however, think a genetics lab metaphor might be far, far more appropriate. Yes, you can create corn that won't reproduce itself.....but you need to control the environment, and you need to create new seeds constantly, for it will not become self-germinating.</p><p></p><p>As wild strawberries are better than commercial ones, and as normal watermelons are sweeter than seedless, the goals behind a commercial venture are not always to produce the best product, but rather the product that will generate the most revenue.</p><p></p><p>That's not evolution of quality for the gamer. That's an experiment in logistics for the gaming company.</p><p></p><p>Moreover, each game is created with a particular <em><strong>philosophy of what is best in gaming</strong></em> in mind. The creators of 4e, for example, were more than happy to tell us what fun is, and what unfun in. The problem is, not everyone agrees with their ideas of fun and unfun.</p><p></p><p>Both 3e and 4e have some interesting ideas. 4e did away with some of 3e's interesting ideas. 3e did away with some of 2e's interesting ideas. And so it goes. Not better. Not an evolution. Just a change. And, like speciality bred dogs, a change that is less likely to survive if cut off from its' master's loving hand.</p><p></p><p>If, 25 years from now, 4e has the kind of healthy community that 1e does <em><strong>right now</strong></em>, I'll happily say that I am wrong. Heck, if 4e has anything like the market share in 10 years that 3e/Pathfinder has <em><strong>right now</strong></em>, I'll happily say that I am wrong. But I don't think either of those things will occur. Not by a long shot. And I very much doubt that the lead developer of 7e will still play 4e avidly.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 5584673, member: 18280"] I'm not at all sure about that. It seems some pretty maladaptive ideas, that the designers knew were maladaptive at the beginning of the process, have flourished (long combat time, I'm looking at you). It would be cool (for some) if that evolutionary metaphor really worked -- then you could say that what you liked was objectively better (if newer). I, however, think a genetics lab metaphor might be far, far more appropriate. Yes, you can create corn that won't reproduce itself.....but you need to control the environment, and you need to create new seeds constantly, for it will not become self-germinating. As wild strawberries are better than commercial ones, and as normal watermelons are sweeter than seedless, the goals behind a commercial venture are not always to produce the best product, but rather the product that will generate the most revenue. That's not evolution of quality for the gamer. That's an experiment in logistics for the gaming company. Moreover, each game is created with a particular [i][b]philosophy of what is best in gaming[/b][/i] in mind. The creators of 4e, for example, were more than happy to tell us what fun is, and what unfun in. The problem is, not everyone agrees with their ideas of fun and unfun. Both 3e and 4e have some interesting ideas. 4e did away with some of 3e's interesting ideas. 3e did away with some of 2e's interesting ideas. And so it goes. Not better. Not an evolution. Just a change. And, like speciality bred dogs, a change that is less likely to survive if cut off from its' master's loving hand. If, 25 years from now, 4e has the kind of healthy community that 1e does [i][b]right now[/b][/i][b][/b], I'll happily say that I am wrong. Heck, if 4e has anything like the market share in 10 years that 3e/Pathfinder has [i][b]right now[/b][/i][b][/b], I'll happily say that I am wrong. But I don't think either of those things will occur. Not by a long shot. And I very much doubt that the lead developer of 7e will still play 4e avidly. RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D 5th Edition!!! (WITH POLL!!!)
Top