Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D 6th edition - What do you want to see?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 7791984" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>I doubt we will see 6e within the next ten years, tbh. </p><p></p><p>But, if I had Mike's job, my priorities for a 6e would be:</p><p></p><p>1. Backward compatibility, and don't call it 6e. </p><p></p><p>2. Do not break apart the ranger, or rebuild it to use terrain as it's subclass, or any such conceptual overhaul. The ranger needs to do what it already does, but actually be effective at all levels, and for every choice to actually meaningfully impact the character. </p><p> [sblock] Natural Explorer should still include a favored terrain choice, which should give benefits to exploration in general, but particularly in stuff like movement, stealth, surviving hazards, etc, so that it is sometimes useful in combat as well. It should also have always on travel benefits for the whole team. If they can be tailored to a terrain but still useful anywhere, great. </p><p> Favored Enemy should stop being about choosing a species or similar grouping, and instead be things like "behemoths, hordes, outsiders, conjurations, spellcasters," etc. Dragons might be fine, but if things like Rocs and Griffons can be put in a group with them, that's better. Then, the benefit is to tracking, interacting with, evading, and fighting those types of creatures. Things like "when a flying creature that is larger than you leaves your threatened space, you can make an Opportunity Attack even if they Disengage or otherwise have an ability to move without provoking them." or the Hunter Ranger's Horde Breaker benefit. Basically consume the Hunter into the favored enemy class feature. </p><p>Also, Rangers would have known spells equal to their Wisdom mod+half level, and Favored enemy would give the ability to use Hunter's Mark without a spell slot against a creature that qualifies as your favored enemy, or something like that. I prefer to keep HM a spell, though. I wouldn't replace it with a class feature, as such. [/sblock]</p><p></p><p>3. Give monsters skills, and bring back thinks like "leader" and "elite" classifications as templates to add to monsters, also clean up the math of monsters so that they are easier to adjust, and experiment in playtesting with different ways to make monsters more dynamic without making them overwhelming. </p><p></p><p>4. Move further away from the idea that humanoid races can be born evil. </p><p></p><p>5. Experiment with giving Fighters Legendary Actions instead of more extra attacks. </p><p></p><p>6. Make Inspiration more front and center, in part by having characters automatically have inspiration when they gain a level, or maybe even at the start of an adventuring day, or something. </p><p></p><p>7. Experiment with Extended Rests, as an expansion on Downtime. Provide alternate rules for only recovering some of your resources with a Long Rest. Perhaps half your spell levels in slots, for instance. Basically model something similar to the Journey rules in The One Ring and Adventures in Middle Earth, where you have to rest in a place of true safety to fully get back to 100%. But also provide bonuses when you take an Extended Rest, especially if you do so in a place where you are very well regarded, or in your own stronghold, etc. See 6; maybe you gain Inspiration at the end of an Extended Rest, in addition to being able to gain it by doing cool stuff and playing your character well. </p><p></p><p>8. Make Travel more interesting. This would be a big goal, but I don't have any concrete ideas for it off the top of my head. </p><p></p><p>9. Include actual advice for crafting, running a business, leading an organization, etc. Doesn't need to be whole subsystems, but some degree of support for DMs that don't want to invent a whole system from scratch or spend the whole campaign playing "idk just...um...roll a thing. okay, that seems pretty good...XYZ happens".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 7791984, member: 6704184"] I doubt we will see 6e within the next ten years, tbh. But, if I had Mike's job, my priorities for a 6e would be: 1. Backward compatibility, and don't call it 6e. 2. Do not break apart the ranger, or rebuild it to use terrain as it's subclass, or any such conceptual overhaul. The ranger needs to do what it already does, but actually be effective at all levels, and for every choice to actually meaningfully impact the character. [sblock] Natural Explorer should still include a favored terrain choice, which should give benefits to exploration in general, but particularly in stuff like movement, stealth, surviving hazards, etc, so that it is sometimes useful in combat as well. It should also have always on travel benefits for the whole team. If they can be tailored to a terrain but still useful anywhere, great. Favored Enemy should stop being about choosing a species or similar grouping, and instead be things like "behemoths, hordes, outsiders, conjurations, spellcasters," etc. Dragons might be fine, but if things like Rocs and Griffons can be put in a group with them, that's better. Then, the benefit is to tracking, interacting with, evading, and fighting those types of creatures. Things like "when a flying creature that is larger than you leaves your threatened space, you can make an Opportunity Attack even if they Disengage or otherwise have an ability to move without provoking them." or the Hunter Ranger's Horde Breaker benefit. Basically consume the Hunter into the favored enemy class feature. Also, Rangers would have known spells equal to their Wisdom mod+half level, and Favored enemy would give the ability to use Hunter's Mark without a spell slot against a creature that qualifies as your favored enemy, or something like that. I prefer to keep HM a spell, though. I wouldn't replace it with a class feature, as such. [/sblock] 3. Give monsters skills, and bring back thinks like "leader" and "elite" classifications as templates to add to monsters, also clean up the math of monsters so that they are easier to adjust, and experiment in playtesting with different ways to make monsters more dynamic without making them overwhelming. 4. Move further away from the idea that humanoid races can be born evil. 5. Experiment with giving Fighters Legendary Actions instead of more extra attacks. 6. Make Inspiration more front and center, in part by having characters automatically have inspiration when they gain a level, or maybe even at the start of an adventuring day, or something. 7. Experiment with Extended Rests, as an expansion on Downtime. Provide alternate rules for only recovering some of your resources with a Long Rest. Perhaps half your spell levels in slots, for instance. Basically model something similar to the Journey rules in The One Ring and Adventures in Middle Earth, where you have to rest in a place of true safety to fully get back to 100%. But also provide bonuses when you take an Extended Rest, especially if you do so in a place where you are very well regarded, or in your own stronghold, etc. See 6; maybe you gain Inspiration at the end of an Extended Rest, in addition to being able to gain it by doing cool stuff and playing your character well. 8. Make Travel more interesting. This would be a big goal, but I don't have any concrete ideas for it off the top of my head. 9. Include actual advice for crafting, running a business, leading an organization, etc. Doesn't need to be whole subsystems, but some degree of support for DMs that don't want to invent a whole system from scratch or spend the whole campaign playing "idk just...um...roll a thing. okay, that seems pretty good...XYZ happens". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D 6th edition - What do you want to see?
Top