Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D and Racial Essentialism
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 5116744" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>It isn't just a feasibility standpoint either. Generally in science-fiction set in a galactic mileu with many races, humans are represented as monocultural as well. Part of that is from the standpoint of feasibility, but part of that is simple literary device to contrast the human position from a non-human position in a clear manner.</p><p></p><p>And note that this isn't a judgemental position necessarily either. You don't necessarily need to be claiming that the human position is inferior or superior to the non-human one. They are just different.</p><p></p><p>To be completely open with what makes me uncomfortable in this discussion it is the assumption by some that in order to show respect for 'The Other' you have to make them exactly the same as yourself. In other words, if I show humans as being multi-cultural or otherwise diverse, and I show some other race as not being multi-cutural and relatively undiverse, some are suggesting that this is disrespectful to 'The Other'. Quite bluntly, I consider the reverse to be true. If the only way you can only treat 'The Other' respectfully is to imagine that on every substantive point, humans and non-humans must be the same, then really you are completely uncomfortable with the idea of the 'The Other' entirely. </p><p></p><p>The fact is 'The Other' is alien by definition. If you feel compelled to write away any feature that would actually make an alien different, then you are engaging not only in a dangerous willful blindness but lack any capacity to empathize with 'The Other' in the first place. Both are to me very dangerous, and speaking as a computer programmer with interests in ethical AI, I find both assumptions to be both appalling and horribly dangerous.</p><p></p><p>So, I find an imagined setting where the aliens within it share and do not share various important features with humanity to be one that is much more mature, sophisticated, and compelling than one where everything - regardless of biology - shares all the fundamental characteristics of humanity. That the 'alien' is nothing more than a human in a different shape is insulting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 5116744, member: 4937"] It isn't just a feasibility standpoint either. Generally in science-fiction set in a galactic mileu with many races, humans are represented as monocultural as well. Part of that is from the standpoint of feasibility, but part of that is simple literary device to contrast the human position from a non-human position in a clear manner. And note that this isn't a judgemental position necessarily either. You don't necessarily need to be claiming that the human position is inferior or superior to the non-human one. They are just different. To be completely open with what makes me uncomfortable in this discussion it is the assumption by some that in order to show respect for 'The Other' you have to make them exactly the same as yourself. In other words, if I show humans as being multi-cultural or otherwise diverse, and I show some other race as not being multi-cutural and relatively undiverse, some are suggesting that this is disrespectful to 'The Other'. Quite bluntly, I consider the reverse to be true. If the only way you can only treat 'The Other' respectfully is to imagine that on every substantive point, humans and non-humans must be the same, then really you are completely uncomfortable with the idea of the 'The Other' entirely. The fact is 'The Other' is alien by definition. If you feel compelled to write away any feature that would actually make an alien different, then you are engaging not only in a dangerous willful blindness but lack any capacity to empathize with 'The Other' in the first place. Both are to me very dangerous, and speaking as a computer programmer with interests in ethical AI, I find both assumptions to be both appalling and horribly dangerous. So, I find an imagined setting where the aliens within it share and do not share various important features with humanity to be one that is much more mature, sophisticated, and compelling than one where everything - regardless of biology - shares all the fundamental characteristics of humanity. That the 'alien' is nothing more than a human in a different shape is insulting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D and Racial Essentialism
Top