Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
D&D and the rising pandemic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Beleriphon" data-source="post: 7939033" data-attributes="member: 27847"><p>SARS had a mortality rate of over 10%. MERS had a mortality rate of 34%.</p><p></p><p>As of right now we don't know what the actual mortality rate in the general populace is, in part because we can't test enough people. Even in the US having at last check something like 200,000 test kits being made available doesn't help, since two kits are used per person to confirm, and only a limited number can be processed per day. So, we are unlikely to have anything approaching an accurate value.</p><p></p><p>Here's a good source on what to look for in media reports to be able to determine if it is accurately reporting information, or what kind of information you want to look out for:</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.propublica.org/article/i-lived-through-sars-and-reported-on-ebola-these-are-the-questions-we-should-be-asking-about-coronavirus[/URL]</p><p></p><p>As of right now 3.4% mortality rate is among confirmed cases, the actual value could be much, much lower since many more people could be asymptomatic (which is a real problem), or simply not have particularly serious symptoms and never get tested.</p><p></p><p>As for the R<span style="font-size: 9px">0 </span>that is a moving target, just like the mortality rate. It is probably more accurate than the mortality rate at the moment, but again it is in flux and will more than likely change.</p><p></p><p>Just a data point for consideration: the US mortality rate for influenza and pneumonia last year was 6.9%.</p><p></p><p>South Korea for example is reporting that the mortality rate is around 0.6%, that is based on 1100 per million residents. Compare that value to the US which is reporting 3.4% mortality, but has administered 7 tests per million residents.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I actually don't think it is distrust, at least not for me. I trust the media to be report what they have accurately, but the problem is they often don't ask the right questions to get reliable and reasonable information. And that comes down to not knowing what to ask, or why to ask certain questions.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That seems like a pretty good reason right there. If you're at risk, don't put yourself at risk. If you aren't at risk, and aren't like to spread the virus to others at risk, it probably isn't worth disrupting your life over.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Beleriphon, post: 7939033, member: 27847"] SARS had a mortality rate of over 10%. MERS had a mortality rate of 34%. As of right now we don't know what the actual mortality rate in the general populace is, in part because we can't test enough people. Even in the US having at last check something like 200,000 test kits being made available doesn't help, since two kits are used per person to confirm, and only a limited number can be processed per day. So, we are unlikely to have anything approaching an accurate value. Here's a good source on what to look for in media reports to be able to determine if it is accurately reporting information, or what kind of information you want to look out for: [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.propublica.org/article/i-lived-through-sars-and-reported-on-ebola-these-are-the-questions-we-should-be-asking-about-coronavirus[/URL] As of right now 3.4% mortality rate is among confirmed cases, the actual value could be much, much lower since many more people could be asymptomatic (which is a real problem), or simply not have particularly serious symptoms and never get tested. As for the R[SIZE=1]0 [/SIZE]that is a moving target, just like the mortality rate. It is probably more accurate than the mortality rate at the moment, but again it is in flux and will more than likely change. Just a data point for consideration: the US mortality rate for influenza and pneumonia last year was 6.9%. South Korea for example is reporting that the mortality rate is around 0.6%, that is based on 1100 per million residents. Compare that value to the US which is reporting 3.4% mortality, but has administered 7 tests per million residents. I actually don't think it is distrust, at least not for me. I trust the media to be report what they have accurately, but the problem is they often don't ask the right questions to get reliable and reasonable information. And that comes down to not knowing what to ask, or why to ask certain questions. That seems like a pretty good reason right there. If you're at risk, don't put yourself at risk. If you aren't at risk, and aren't like to spread the virus to others at risk, it probably isn't worth disrupting your life over. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
D&D and the rising pandemic
Top