Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
D&D and the rising pandemic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dannyalcatraz" data-source="post: 8166351" data-attributes="member: 19675"><p>You can’t say a plan ”failed“ that most of the country did not even approach reasonable implementation of it. And considering it “medically derived” when a good portion of our leadership either downplayed it or considered it a hoax is stretching things a bit.</p><p></p><p>The actual instructions from healthcare pros DID distinguish between the healthy and the sick, hence things like contact tracing.</p><p></p><p>Putting aside the time it took to devise tests to diagnose C19 in the first place, separating the sick from the healthy is problematic when @30% of the afflicted are asymptomatic for the bulk or entirety of their infectious period. By the time we could ID the infected with any accuracy, C19 was pretty much endemic. Simply putting up containment lines of barricades and road blocks would have been futile.</p><p></p><p>Similarly futile would be advocating immune boosting practices beyond what MDs typically advise of their patients. This was a novel pathogen. Even perfectly healthy people‘s immune systems could be overwhelmed because virtually nobody’s immune system had prior exposure to It.*</p><p></p><p>Lockdowns were used for this pandemic because <em>we had no vaccines or viable treatments for C19</em> AND no way to diagnose those with C19 until they had been infectious for some time. Also, if you look at the past 100 years of global responses to epidemics, you WILL see the use of lockdowns and mass quarantines for diseases like Ebola.</p><p></p><p>Epidemiologists DID acknowledge and openly discuss the economic and mental health care aspects of the lockdowns. Some of the more...colorful commentators noted you can’t have a functioning economy if too many people are dead & dying. (C19’s mortality rate hadn’t yet been calculated as a global average.) And I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen reminder PSAs to check on friends and family to see how they handling things.</p><p></p><p>And if you think the Hippocratic Oath’s admonition about doing no harm is all encompassing and absolute, you must have SERIOUS problems with modern medical practice and pharmacology in general.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>* Researchers have found that a small percentage of people exposed to some of the cold-causing coronaviruses had a slightly better immune response than those who hadn’t.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dannyalcatraz, post: 8166351, member: 19675"] You can’t say a plan ”failed“ that most of the country did not even approach reasonable implementation of it. And considering it “medically derived” when a good portion of our leadership either downplayed it or considered it a hoax is stretching things a bit. The actual instructions from healthcare pros DID distinguish between the healthy and the sick, hence things like contact tracing. Putting aside the time it took to devise tests to diagnose C19 in the first place, separating the sick from the healthy is problematic when @30% of the afflicted are asymptomatic for the bulk or entirety of their infectious period. By the time we could ID the infected with any accuracy, C19 was pretty much endemic. Simply putting up containment lines of barricades and road blocks would have been futile. Similarly futile would be advocating immune boosting practices beyond what MDs typically advise of their patients. This was a novel pathogen. Even perfectly healthy people‘s immune systems could be overwhelmed because virtually nobody’s immune system had prior exposure to It.* Lockdowns were used for this pandemic because [I]we had no vaccines or viable treatments for C19[/I] AND no way to diagnose those with C19 until they had been infectious for some time. Also, if you look at the past 100 years of global responses to epidemics, you WILL see the use of lockdowns and mass quarantines for diseases like Ebola. Epidemiologists DID acknowledge and openly discuss the economic and mental health care aspects of the lockdowns. Some of the more...colorful commentators noted you can’t have a functioning economy if too many people are dead & dying. (C19’s mortality rate hadn’t yet been calculated as a global average.) And I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen reminder PSAs to check on friends and family to see how they handling things. And if you think the Hippocratic Oath’s admonition about doing no harm is all encompassing and absolute, you must have SERIOUS problems with modern medical practice and pharmacology in general. * Researchers have found that a small percentage of people exposed to some of the cold-causing coronaviruses had a slightly better immune response than those who hadn’t. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
D&D and the rising pandemic
Top