Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Cadence" data-source="post: 8373043" data-attributes="member: 6701124">No argument against that.It feels like the people who need the most support need the best locations in terms of being close to lots of opportunities and services.  Which means the places for them to live are competing with the folks with lots of $.  I'm not sure how to fix that without burning the entire system down.I don't think most places would even be happy with  legal requirements for every neighborhood to have a certain percent of affordable/subsidized housing.  And if they were, a lot of that housing won't be close to where the people who could use it are or want to be (as suburbs without a ton of jobs nearby or in states hundreds of miles away).</blockquote>