Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D and who it's aimed at
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Levistus's_Leviathan" data-source="post: 8615246" data-attributes="member: 7023887"><p>Then what are you saying? </p><p></p><p>No, actually, that's not my position. I think that D&D is more diverse than ever, in playstyle, types of books being published, and the player base. I think that if someone thinks that modern D&D is too cute and fluffy, they're really not looking hard enough because there's plenty of other stuff not at all cute and fluffy (Ravenloft, Avernus, Dragonlance, Fizban's, Netherdeep). </p><p></p><p>I think that if you want to run a badass game of D&D 5e, you can definitely do that with quite a few of the recent releases. If you want a goofy/gonzo adventure, you can definitely do that with quite a few of the recent releases. I think that it's a good thing that there's this diverse of options for people to use. I think that it expands the hobby to support different playstyles, and that there is value in the "cute and fluffy" stuff being available for the people that want it, just like there is value in supporting darker/grimmer playstyles of the game. </p><p></p><p>Not every release has to be for you. Not every release is aimed at you. The same applies to me and every other member of this hobby. That's a good thing. If everything was specifically aimed at my tastes, we would never get Dragonlance, Planescape, Greyhawk, the Forgotten Realms, Magic: the Gathering settings, or any more anthology books. We would just be getting more Eberron, Exandria, Spelljammer, Mordenkainen's/Volo's/Fizban's-style Monster books and more Xanathar's/Tasha's-style player option books for the rest of D&D 5e. That's sincerely what I want, but I can recognize that this would be bad for the hobby and that not every product should/can be aimed at pleasing me. </p><p></p><p>My position is that supporting the playstyles and preferences of people besides me is a good thing. It's a good thing that we're getting Dragonlance, anthology books, and probably Planescape/Dark Sun even though I personally don't want those things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Levistus's_Leviathan, post: 8615246, member: 7023887"] Then what are you saying? No, actually, that's not my position. I think that D&D is more diverse than ever, in playstyle, types of books being published, and the player base. I think that if someone thinks that modern D&D is too cute and fluffy, they're really not looking hard enough because there's plenty of other stuff not at all cute and fluffy (Ravenloft, Avernus, Dragonlance, Fizban's, Netherdeep). I think that if you want to run a badass game of D&D 5e, you can definitely do that with quite a few of the recent releases. If you want a goofy/gonzo adventure, you can definitely do that with quite a few of the recent releases. I think that it's a good thing that there's this diverse of options for people to use. I think that it expands the hobby to support different playstyles, and that there is value in the "cute and fluffy" stuff being available for the people that want it, just like there is value in supporting darker/grimmer playstyles of the game. Not every release has to be for you. Not every release is aimed at you. The same applies to me and every other member of this hobby. That's a good thing. If everything was specifically aimed at my tastes, we would never get Dragonlance, Planescape, Greyhawk, the Forgotten Realms, Magic: the Gathering settings, or any more anthology books. We would just be getting more Eberron, Exandria, Spelljammer, Mordenkainen's/Volo's/Fizban's-style Monster books and more Xanathar's/Tasha's-style player option books for the rest of D&D 5e. That's sincerely what I want, but I can recognize that this would be bad for the hobby and that not every product should/can be aimed at pleasing me. My position is that supporting the playstyles and preferences of people besides me is a good thing. It's a good thing that we're getting Dragonlance, anthology books, and probably Planescape/Dark Sun even though I personally don't want those things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D and who it's aimed at
Top