Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D and who it's aimed at
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Medic" data-source="post: 8615265" data-attributes="member: 7035835"><p>While I actually agree with the premise and assertion that this post conveys, I can't help but feel that using idioms to qualify one's arguments is just a little bit disingenuous. I guess what I'm offering isn't so much a refutation of this post as it is a commentary on it.</p><p></p><p>True, you can't judge a book by its cover. But a picture is worth a thousand words. Beauty is only skin-deep, but the garments make the man. All that glitters is not gold, but fine feathers make fine fowl. You can do this for any proverb. Better to be safe than sorry, but nothing ventured, nothing gained. No man is an island, though good fences make good neighbors. The squeaky wheel gets the grease, but did you know that silence is golden? Such truisms are simply vague enough to give the impression that there is an inner wisdom to them.</p><p></p><p>You are correct in that an informed opinion is strictly superior to an opinion formed in ignorance, though the ice cream comparison (what is it with the internet and food analogies?) neglects the fact that one does not actually need to consume any ice cream to discern its flavor. One single binary question is all that is required to gain the knowledge required to make a 100% informed purchase.</p><p></p><p>If I read the package or ask the vendor, and they inform me that the flavor is "bubblegum," then I can know with certainty that I will dislike it and keep my money. If I instead learn that it is "strawberry," then my purchase is only predicated on whether or not I happen to be craving strawberry ice cream at that moment.</p><p></p><p>The same is not true for a book, however. The best equivalent would be to listen to marketing and hearsay from other consumers to get a feel for it, and even that is a mixed bag. Now, one <em>could </em>explore the substance of a book if they can sample it in the store, borrow it from an acquaintance, or obtain a digital copy that happened to fall off of a truck, this much is undeniable. In fact, one's opinion would be better formed for it. But... why should I, unless I'm actually on the fence about a purchase or just want to shoot spitballs at other EN World users?</p><p></p><p>It's perfectly sufficient for a casual consumer to flip through a book, see a few quirky pictures, catch an odd pop culture reference, skim a small quest hook that they don't much care for, and decide that they'd rather buy a Call of Cthulhu adventure instead.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Dungeons & Dragons made me into a Satanic acolyte, actually!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Medic, post: 8615265, member: 7035835"] While I actually agree with the premise and assertion that this post conveys, I can't help but feel that using idioms to qualify one's arguments is just a little bit disingenuous. I guess what I'm offering isn't so much a refutation of this post as it is a commentary on it. True, you can't judge a book by its cover. But a picture is worth a thousand words. Beauty is only skin-deep, but the garments make the man. All that glitters is not gold, but fine feathers make fine fowl. You can do this for any proverb. Better to be safe than sorry, but nothing ventured, nothing gained. No man is an island, though good fences make good neighbors. The squeaky wheel gets the grease, but did you know that silence is golden? Such truisms are simply vague enough to give the impression that there is an inner wisdom to them. You are correct in that an informed opinion is strictly superior to an opinion formed in ignorance, though the ice cream comparison (what is it with the internet and food analogies?) neglects the fact that one does not actually need to consume any ice cream to discern its flavor. One single binary question is all that is required to gain the knowledge required to make a 100% informed purchase. If I read the package or ask the vendor, and they inform me that the flavor is "bubblegum," then I can know with certainty that I will dislike it and keep my money. If I instead learn that it is "strawberry," then my purchase is only predicated on whether or not I happen to be craving strawberry ice cream at that moment. The same is not true for a book, however. The best equivalent would be to listen to marketing and hearsay from other consumers to get a feel for it, and even that is a mixed bag. Now, one [I]could [/I]explore the substance of a book if they can sample it in the store, borrow it from an acquaintance, or obtain a digital copy that happened to fall off of a truck, this much is undeniable. In fact, one's opinion would be better formed for it. But... why should I, unless I'm actually on the fence about a purchase or just want to shoot spitballs at other EN World users? It's perfectly sufficient for a casual consumer to flip through a book, see a few quirky pictures, catch an odd pop culture reference, skim a small quest hook that they don't much care for, and decide that they'd rather buy a Call of Cthulhu adventure instead. Dungeons & Dragons made me into a Satanic acolyte, actually! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D and who it's aimed at
Top