Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scribe" data-source="post: 8615366" data-attributes="member: 6807152">Yes well, thats pretty much explicitly my point.I dont have a problem with Conan. It seems that 'modern sensibilities' would indicate that I should. Wizards targeting a demographic which finds Conan problematic, is or has or will continue, to sanitize their product to not offend and appeal to that target demographic.Which is 100% fine, and is simply what several folks here have stated."Yes, Wizards is sanitizing their products for their target demographic."Which wouldnt seem to be the same target demographic, as DCC has.So yes, D&D is aiming their product at someone else, which is fine. Still nothing wrong with Conan. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />EDIT: And the funny part is, there is a Sword and Sorcery component in the Ravenloft book, as a type of Horror right?So why didnt Wizards lean into that, show some art in the style associated, really market that as an option. Heck, its in the DM guide too right?Because its not sanitary. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>