Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Assumptions Ain't What They Used To Be
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 9388019" data-attributes="member: 6779196"><p>Yeah, reactionary politics are rough to deal with. The good news is, they are a sign of progress. It’s a long observed pattern that whenever big strides are made towards social equity, there is pushback in <em>reaction</em> to that progress. Sometimes those reactions can be quite extreme, and it can be rough to live through a period where reactionary politics are on the rise. But in the long term, that pushback eventually subsides, and net progress is made. The road is long, but it bends towards justice.</p><p></p><p>Yeah, this is the part I personally struggle the most with, because I really love a good, classic dungeon delve with iconic monsters as enemies, but that premise has deeply colonial underpinnings. I don’t think there are any easy answers when it comes to decolonizing D&D, but I think it’s a worthwhile goal to pursue. </p><p></p><p>I think this one is a matter of deconstructing “madness” and reconstructing something else to fill its thematic space. Part of how Lovecraft played on the fear of mental illness in his work was to imply that what we consider sanity is really just blissful ignorance, and what we mistake for madness is just deeper insight into truths too horrible to accept. I would recommend those who want to play with themes of cosmic horror lean into that. Glimpsing the horror of the far realm doesn’t “drive you insane,” it’s just deeply traumatic. For a good example of this done well, I look to Bloodborne, where instead of a depleting sanity score, you have an increasing Insight score. With higher Insight, you start to see things that were there all along, but your mind couldn’t accept; and once you see them, and they see you seeing them, they pose a greater threat to you.</p><p></p><p>It’s a shame we’re stuck with the name Barbarian, because I don’t think the class is all that bad at a base mechanical level. A warrior who uses an altered state of consciousness to enhance their fighting abilities is cool, and has plenty of mythical and historical precedent across many cultures. But the name Barbarian and the altered state being called Rage are anchors around the class’s neck.</p><p></p><p>We are seeing a move towards more specially diverse humanoid settlements being depicted in WotC’s settings, which I think is a move in the right direction. Intelligence as a stat is another case where the need to stick with old naming conventions holds us back. It’s functionally just the “pass more knowledge checks” stat, and for wizards rhe “cast spells better” stat, which fits with their story of gaining magic through studious dedication.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 9388019, member: 6779196"] Yeah, reactionary politics are rough to deal with. The good news is, they are a sign of progress. It’s a long observed pattern that whenever big strides are made towards social equity, there is pushback in [I]reaction[/I] to that progress. Sometimes those reactions can be quite extreme, and it can be rough to live through a period where reactionary politics are on the rise. But in the long term, that pushback eventually subsides, and net progress is made. The road is long, but it bends towards justice. Yeah, this is the part I personally struggle the most with, because I really love a good, classic dungeon delve with iconic monsters as enemies, but that premise has deeply colonial underpinnings. I don’t think there are any easy answers when it comes to decolonizing D&D, but I think it’s a worthwhile goal to pursue. I think this one is a matter of deconstructing “madness” and reconstructing something else to fill its thematic space. Part of how Lovecraft played on the fear of mental illness in his work was to imply that what we consider sanity is really just blissful ignorance, and what we mistake for madness is just deeper insight into truths too horrible to accept. I would recommend those who want to play with themes of cosmic horror lean into that. Glimpsing the horror of the far realm doesn’t “drive you insane,” it’s just deeply traumatic. For a good example of this done well, I look to Bloodborne, where instead of a depleting sanity score, you have an increasing Insight score. With higher Insight, you start to see things that were there all along, but your mind couldn’t accept; and once you see them, and they see you seeing them, they pose a greater threat to you. It’s a shame we’re stuck with the name Barbarian, because I don’t think the class is all that bad at a base mechanical level. A warrior who uses an altered state of consciousness to enhance their fighting abilities is cool, and has plenty of mythical and historical precedent across many cultures. But the name Barbarian and the altered state being called Rage are anchors around the class’s neck. We are seeing a move towards more specially diverse humanoid settlements being depicted in WotC’s settings, which I think is a move in the right direction. Intelligence as a stat is another case where the need to stick with old naming conventions holds us back. It’s functionally just the “pass more knowledge checks” stat, and for wizards rhe “cast spells better” stat, which fits with their story of gaining magic through studious dedication. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Assumptions Ain't What They Used To Be
Top