Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ruin Explorer" data-source="post: 9514264" data-attributes="member: 18">Sure, but again I don't think it's even as complicated as an Artificer is, even accounting for the fact that Artificers use existing spells/items (albeit often in odd ways).Sure, and many are afraid of 3PP classes/subclasses per se, and not without reason, because most 3PP classes are much, much worse balance-wise (in either direction, sometimes both at once!) than WotC's own 5E classes/subclasses (something which wasn't true in say, 3.XE). Obviously I'd recommend any DM familiarize themselves with any classes/subclasses they're allowing, but I think that's true with WotC ones too. I don't think most DMs actually have a good idea how every official class/subclass in 5E works, even if they think they do. Revised Illrigger has some cute tricks, but they use 5E's action economy pretty appropriately, which keeps a lid on them.</blockquote>