Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 7928735" data-attributes="member: 15700">As expected.&nbsp; You jump in with two strawman, and then when asked for citations to support your argument, you refuse and walk out.I've provided not only first hand subject matter testimony on my own behalf, but I've linked several times in this discussion to sites that also define how testing works and what those terms mean.&nbsp; And you disagree, but can't manage to provide any supporting evidence of your own.You said you're a software developer, right?&nbsp; Did it for years?This would be like you saying how coding a particular piece of software works, and me coming in and saying &quot;nope.&nbsp; That's not how it works.&quot; despite me having no real direct coding knowledge (only visual basic, PASCAL, and whatever minor stuff I've seen when working with developers myself).So you repeat, &quot;No, this is my job.&nbsp; I'm telling you how it works.&nbsp; This is how.&nbsp; And here are some links to professional sites that show you how and why that works.&quot;And I say, &quot;Nope.&nbsp; Are you the one true way?&nbsp; I know a guy who does it this way, so it must be the right way.&quot;&nbsp; Despite you knowing that I'm not remotely accurate.&nbsp; And despite me not providing you any evidence to how my assumptions are accurate to counter all the evidence you provided. That's how this conversation went.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 7928735, member: 15700"] As expected. You jump in with two strawman, and then when asked for citations to support your argument, you refuse and walk out. I've provided not only first hand subject matter testimony on my own behalf, but I've linked several times in this discussion to sites that also define how testing works and what those terms mean. And you disagree, but can't manage to provide any supporting evidence of your own. You said you're a software developer, right? Did it for years? This would be like you saying how coding a particular piece of software works, and me coming in and saying "nope. That's not how it works." despite me having no real direct coding knowledge (only visual basic, PASCAL, and whatever minor stuff I've seen when working with developers myself). So you repeat, "No, this is my job. I'm telling you how it works. This is how. And here are some links to professional sites that show you how and why that works." And I say, "Nope. Are you the one true way? I know a guy who does it this way, so it must be the right way." Despite you knowing that I'm not remotely accurate. And despite me not providing you any evidence to how my assumptions are accurate to counter all the evidence you provided. That's how this conversation went. [/QUOTE]

Verification