Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 8523833" data-attributes="member: 59057">That is a very good explanation, thank you. I also hope, that in 2024 we will get a new coherent set of rules that will be the new standard. When 3.5 came along I was not really ready for a change, and in hindsight, I didn't like the changes at all. 3e captured my playstyle way better and fixes in the opposite direction as 3.5 took would have been better. 4e essentials did exactly that. They took 4e and made it more to my liking. 5e was the perfekt game for me and I can still see a lot of room for improvement. Right now I see changes/additions/options forRacesClassesSpellsDowntime activitiesAnd I currently like more than I don't. But you are absolutely right. Right now it could take a wrong turn and be 3.5 rather than essentials (for me). The change in monster design for example as it is, is not exactly my coup of tea. I hope they will find a better solution over the next two years.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="UngeheuerLich, post: 8523833, member: 59057"] That is a very good explanation, thank you. I also hope, that in 2024 we will get a new coherent set of rules that will be the new standard. When 3.5 came along I was not really ready for a change, and in hindsight, I didn't like the changes at all. 3e captured my playstyle way better and fixes in the opposite direction as 3.5 took would have been better. 4e essentials did exactly that. They took 4e and made it more to my liking. 5e was the perfekt game for me and I can still see a lot of room for improvement. Right now I see changes/additions/options for Races Classes Spells Downtime activities And I currently like more than I don't. But you are absolutely right. Right now it could take a wrong turn and be 3.5 rather than essentials (for me). The change in monster design for example as it is, is not exactly my coup of tea. I hope they will find a better solution over the next two years. [/QUOTE]

Verification