Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Beyond: Monsters of the Multiverse Will Not Replace Existing Monsters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8524776" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>So, based on all the information we have these changes affect no one beyond spellcasters using Counterspell in a purely negative manner. Changing CR doesn't change anything for players. And the Racial options are a rebalance, but the old versions are still imminently usable, and in the case of many abilities a flat improvement. Like the Earth Genasi getting bonus action Blade Ward Prof times per day.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a change in design philosophy. That is blatantly obvious. What it is not is a completely new design. This design has existed, it simply wasn't as wide-spread. And even if the designers announced this was 6e... people would complain about the changes made to the game if you tried to implement it. The type of people you are describing aren't complaining about not knowing about the changes ahead of time. They are complaining that the changes occurred at all, and that it doesn't fit their preconceived notions. </p><p></p><p>So again, nothing about what you are proposing (people complaining because the encounter doesn't meet their expectations) is a <strong><em>design </em></strong>problem.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And yet limiting spellcasting while giving magical actions that can be repeated is not an individual change and is instead a systematic overhaul? Based on what? I don't expect Trolls to change with this new design. I don't expect Bodaks to change with this new design. I don't expect the Champion to change with this design. </p><p></p><p>This only affects spellcasting monsters. That is a limited subset</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>When was the last time anyone seriously used CR in a discussion in these forums? CR has been notoriously inaccurate for years. Saying "CR is off" is like saying "it gets dark at night". We all know. </p><p></p><p>And if people begin an edition war because different books list different CR values... then they would start an edition war over anything. This seems like fear mongering more than a real problem.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I disagree. It is trivially easy to say that you are using the Multiverse Warpriest instead of the Volo's Warpriest. Just like you say if you are using Eberron Orcs instead of Grey Orcs. It is trivial to say you are using the Multiverse Goblin PC race instead of Volo's Goblin PC race, just like you say you are using Aerni High Elves instead of PHB High Elves. </p><p></p><p>But it all still uses the same basic math, the same basic assumptions, and can be used interchangeable. Calling this 6th edition would make it sound like they are completely incompatible, and the exact opposite is true.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8524776, member: 6801228"] So, based on all the information we have these changes affect no one beyond spellcasters using Counterspell in a purely negative manner. Changing CR doesn't change anything for players. And the Racial options are a rebalance, but the old versions are still imminently usable, and in the case of many abilities a flat improvement. Like the Earth Genasi getting bonus action Blade Ward Prof times per day. This is a change in design philosophy. That is blatantly obvious. What it is not is a completely new design. This design has existed, it simply wasn't as wide-spread. And even if the designers announced this was 6e... people would complain about the changes made to the game if you tried to implement it. The type of people you are describing aren't complaining about not knowing about the changes ahead of time. They are complaining that the changes occurred at all, and that it doesn't fit their preconceived notions. So again, nothing about what you are proposing (people complaining because the encounter doesn't meet their expectations) is a [B][I]design [/I][/B]problem. And yet limiting spellcasting while giving magical actions that can be repeated is not an individual change and is instead a systematic overhaul? Based on what? I don't expect Trolls to change with this new design. I don't expect Bodaks to change with this new design. I don't expect the Champion to change with this design. This only affects spellcasting monsters. That is a limited subset When was the last time anyone seriously used CR in a discussion in these forums? CR has been notoriously inaccurate for years. Saying "CR is off" is like saying "it gets dark at night". We all know. And if people begin an edition war because different books list different CR values... then they would start an edition war over anything. This seems like fear mongering more than a real problem. I disagree. It is trivially easy to say that you are using the Multiverse Warpriest instead of the Volo's Warpriest. Just like you say if you are using Eberron Orcs instead of Grey Orcs. It is trivial to say you are using the Multiverse Goblin PC race instead of Volo's Goblin PC race, just like you say you are using Aerni High Elves instead of PHB High Elves. But it all still uses the same basic math, the same basic assumptions, and can be used interchangeable. Calling this 6th edition would make it sound like they are completely incompatible, and the exact opposite is true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Beyond: Monsters of the Multiverse Will Not Replace Existing Monsters
Top