Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="triqui" data-source="post: 5846980" data-attributes="member: 57948">I don't see how this relates to OGL. 2e did not have more gimmicky elements than 3e, but wasn't open. Being open or not is just a matter of will, if they want to include a SRD they'll do, if they don't want to, they won't. Rerrolling d20 or adding +1d6 with action points won't effect that will, whatever one it is.So bassically, we will  see, but whatever is the result even if it is not open gaming, yout logic seems faulty. They'll go OGL or not, as a separate decission. It has nothing to do with funky dice rolls. There are several funky game systems that are Open Gaming systems. Fudge for example.If you mean it won't be compatible with current OGL d20 3.x material... yes, I'm sure about that. It won't. It can't be compatible, given the hints they have shown us. However, that does not mean it can´t use an open gaming license.</blockquote>