Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Shemeska" data-source="post: 5334762" data-attributes="member: 11697">It's all over the place, IMO as a result of the 4e default quasi-setting being just that - never a formal setting. Add in lots of people working on it, plus often relying on the use of 1e/2e/3e canon elements that carry their own canonical assumptions now within a cosmology that doesn't support them, and it gets awkward quickly.There's also some contradictory material across various books that makes me think that there isn't one person with the editorial job to keep material self-consistent across various books - and it may have really never been a big concern since PoL has been treated like a sandbox wherein canon (or traditional setting production values if you will) isn't a priority.And that could hamstring them to an extent if they make PoL into a more formalized setting (to say nothing about the issues raised with PoL default material being inserted haphazardly piecemeal into the other settings, some of which like FR or Ebberon already had their own established canon that got replaced).Anyone having worked for WotC: was there ever any sort of PoL setting bible, or was it handled much less formally?</blockquote>