Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Cited in Hasbro Quarterly Report as Revenue Increase for Hasbro
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 6512588" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>No, again, that is meaningless for a 10-Q. It doesn't get reported. Indeed, it could result in a shareholder lawsuit if they do things like that, if it's not a material gain for Hasbro in general. They did not report it was an increase over the prior quarter for D&D. They reported it was an increase for Hasbro's overall revenue, in a material way. So no, they're saying it did well - well enough to finally blip onto the total Hasbro revenue, which is totally independent of how it did previously. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, it was never a line-item one way or the other. WOTC is the line-item for that. It's only being mentioned because it warrants mention for Hasbro overall revenue increases, not relative to prior rates. The report would be thousands of pages long if it were detailing every product rise and fall.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't know what's not making sense here - it has to be a material increase for HASBRO'S OVERALL REVENUE to get a report item. If they reported every major increase even if it resulted in immaterial sums, they would be accused of being misleading in their reports. This is not a PR document - it's covered by FTC rules. It's not the type of increase you're talking about - we know this, for sure, 100%, unless you have evidence of fraudulent reporting. Which you don't. So no, that's not what this is.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, that is not what it proves. I understand you may not be familiar with quarterly reporting for public companies...but now you are. We know it means the launch did well. We know that - it's not in doubt, you have it in black and white in an official document, reported to the Government and to all shareholders, that is bound by FTC law and under threat of shareholder lawsuit for misleading statements. That's the best you're ever going to get for any type of industry - it's as certain as you can get.</p><p></p><p>It does not mean anything necessarily for long term success, but we can finally put to bed any claim that the launch didn't do well financially. We know, for sure, it did.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 6512588, member: 2525"] No, again, that is meaningless for a 10-Q. It doesn't get reported. Indeed, it could result in a shareholder lawsuit if they do things like that, if it's not a material gain for Hasbro in general. They did not report it was an increase over the prior quarter for D&D. They reported it was an increase for Hasbro's overall revenue, in a material way. So no, they're saying it did well - well enough to finally blip onto the total Hasbro revenue, which is totally independent of how it did previously. No, it was never a line-item one way or the other. WOTC is the line-item for that. It's only being mentioned because it warrants mention for Hasbro overall revenue increases, not relative to prior rates. The report would be thousands of pages long if it were detailing every product rise and fall. I don't know what's not making sense here - it has to be a material increase for HASBRO'S OVERALL REVENUE to get a report item. If they reported every major increase even if it resulted in immaterial sums, they would be accused of being misleading in their reports. This is not a PR document - it's covered by FTC rules. It's not the type of increase you're talking about - we know this, for sure, 100%, unless you have evidence of fraudulent reporting. Which you don't. So no, that's not what this is. No, that is not what it proves. I understand you may not be familiar with quarterly reporting for public companies...but now you are. We know it means the launch did well. We know that - it's not in doubt, you have it in black and white in an official document, reported to the Government and to all shareholders, that is bound by FTC law and under threat of shareholder lawsuit for misleading statements. That's the best you're ever going to get for any type of industry - it's as certain as you can get. It does not mean anything necessarily for long term success, but we can finally put to bed any claim that the launch didn't do well financially. We know, for sure, it did. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Cited in Hasbro Quarterly Report as Revenue Increase for Hasbro
Top