Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D Community Different Than the D20 Community?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="woodelf" data-source="post: 2155252" data-attributes="member: 10201"><p>I <em>look at</em> everything, regardless of publisher. I buy what i think is good. Sometimes that means big-name publishers, sometimes it means somebody's first PDF product. Sometimes it means D20 System, more often it means something else. But, and i think this was the real point of the question, the presence or absence of a D20 System logo, or a D&D logo, doesn't really have any impact that i can discern on my purchases. Similarly, i don't automatically avoid any publisher's products. [I do automatically buy a couple publishers' products, or at least automatically if the topic interests me and i can afford it: Atlas Games, Wicked Dead Press, to name a couple.] Heck, even the game system doesn't necessarily cause me to pick up or avoid an RPG book, and all genre will do is adjust the purchasing timetable: a book for a genre i'm currently running will get picked up before one for a genre i'm not, but the latter will, at least theoretically, get bought eventually.</p><p></p><p>With one important caveat: there are some specific design choices in D&D3E that drive me batty, so i don't use the D&D3E core books. My default fantasy D20 System core books are Arcana Unearthed, Everquest D20, and probably soon Blue Rose. So, while i look at each WotC book that comes out, they almost inevitably don't appeal to me, precisely because of their tight compatibility with D&D3[.5]E. However, that's actually not a surprising thing, since i'd grown disenchanted with WotC's RPG products long before D&D3E came out. In fact, i haven't seen a WotC book that was worth the shelf space since they last owned Ars Magica or Talislanta (whichever was more recent). So it makes perfect sense that when they got a chance to redesign D&D, they'd do it in a way that didn't appeal to me. Not to the point where i don't even consider buying the books, but to the point where, despite giving them consideration, i've yet to actually do so.</p><p></p><p>[Of course, by "everything" i don't literally mean everything. First off, i'm sure there are entire companies i've never even heard of, especially in the PDF-only market. Secondly, i have to have some way to "look" at it--either it has to show up in the FLGS, or i have to find a preview or review, or something. Third, some things i can eliminate without even looking. I never so much as considered the stirge book, frex, because i've got no intention of ever using a stirge in a game, or even having them exist in my gameworld, so it doesn't matter how well written it is. Similarly, there's no point in me looking at a modern-military RPG, because i'm just not interested in the genre. ]</p><p></p><p>edit: Forgot to mention two things. First, my gaming buddies are all non-partisans, or anti-D20S-System partisans. Most buy whatever works for their game, and if that game is D20 System (as it often is), they'll use whatever books they think work best, which might or might not be D&D-branded, and might or might not be published by WotC. One, at least, will generally choose the WotC product over the D20 System product, if both cover the same topic. The other will, as near as i can tell, pick the better in that situation, regardless of publisher. </p><p></p><p>The other thing is that, IMHO, simply buying what i think is "best" has consistently driven me *away* from WotC products, even when there is a choice. So, frex, i *love* psionics in my D&D game. You couldn't pay me to use the Psionics Handbook. While the Expanded Psionics Handbook has apparently fixed some of my issues, and would be tolerable, i think the Psychic's Handbook is *much* better, and if i'm gonna put psionics into my D&D game, it'll be either that way, or with the Shadowforce Archer rules. Similarly, I don't think the new Manual of the Planes is anywhere near the best other-worlds book for D&D3E--in fact, i think every other one i've looked at is better [that'd be the Malhavoc book, and the Phil Reed book]. And i'm not yet convinced that any of them holds a candle to The Primal Order: Chessboards.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="woodelf, post: 2155252, member: 10201"] I [i]look at[/i] everything, regardless of publisher. I buy what i think is good. Sometimes that means big-name publishers, sometimes it means somebody's first PDF product. Sometimes it means D20 System, more often it means something else. But, and i think this was the real point of the question, the presence or absence of a D20 System logo, or a D&D logo, doesn't really have any impact that i can discern on my purchases. Similarly, i don't automatically avoid any publisher's products. [I do automatically buy a couple publishers' products, or at least automatically if the topic interests me and i can afford it: Atlas Games, Wicked Dead Press, to name a couple.] Heck, even the game system doesn't necessarily cause me to pick up or avoid an RPG book, and all genre will do is adjust the purchasing timetable: a book for a genre i'm currently running will get picked up before one for a genre i'm not, but the latter will, at least theoretically, get bought eventually. With one important caveat: there are some specific design choices in D&D3E that drive me batty, so i don't use the D&D3E core books. My default fantasy D20 System core books are Arcana Unearthed, Everquest D20, and probably soon Blue Rose. So, while i look at each WotC book that comes out, they almost inevitably don't appeal to me, precisely because of their tight compatibility with D&D3[.5]E. However, that's actually not a surprising thing, since i'd grown disenchanted with WotC's RPG products long before D&D3E came out. In fact, i haven't seen a WotC book that was worth the shelf space since they last owned Ars Magica or Talislanta (whichever was more recent). So it makes perfect sense that when they got a chance to redesign D&D, they'd do it in a way that didn't appeal to me. Not to the point where i don't even consider buying the books, but to the point where, despite giving them consideration, i've yet to actually do so. [Of course, by "everything" i don't literally mean everything. First off, i'm sure there are entire companies i've never even heard of, especially in the PDF-only market. Secondly, i have to have some way to "look" at it--either it has to show up in the FLGS, or i have to find a preview or review, or something. Third, some things i can eliminate without even looking. I never so much as considered the stirge book, frex, because i've got no intention of ever using a stirge in a game, or even having them exist in my gameworld, so it doesn't matter how well written it is. Similarly, there's no point in me looking at a modern-military RPG, because i'm just not interested in the genre. ] edit: Forgot to mention two things. First, my gaming buddies are all non-partisans, or anti-D20S-System partisans. Most buy whatever works for their game, and if that game is D20 System (as it often is), they'll use whatever books they think work best, which might or might not be D&D-branded, and might or might not be published by WotC. One, at least, will generally choose the WotC product over the D20 System product, if both cover the same topic. The other will, as near as i can tell, pick the better in that situation, regardless of publisher. The other thing is that, IMHO, simply buying what i think is "best" has consistently driven me *away* from WotC products, even when there is a choice. So, frex, i *love* psionics in my D&D game. You couldn't pay me to use the Psionics Handbook. While the Expanded Psionics Handbook has apparently fixed some of my issues, and would be tolerable, i think the Psychic's Handbook is *much* better, and if i'm gonna put psionics into my D&D game, it'll be either that way, or with the Shadowforce Archer rules. Similarly, I don't think the new Manual of the Planes is anywhere near the best other-worlds book for D&D3E--in fact, i think every other one i've looked at is better [that'd be the Malhavoc book, and the Phil Reed book]. And i'm not yet convinced that any of them holds a candle to The Primal Order: Chessboards. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D Community Different Than the D20 Community?
Top