Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 8268161" data-attributes="member: 6704184">OkayRight. That’s the point of that example, that “play Blades” is useless advice for someone wanted to make their next adventure within a campaign a heist, and it amounts to threadcrapping when given in a thread asking for Advice on their D&D game. If I ask for a game recommendation, feel free. But the ask isn’t for advice to play Aliens. It’s for advice to play a fantasy adventure game that will feature similar themes and elements. The thread isn’t about times when someone asks for advice about playing an aliens game in general. Yes. Are you having fun arguing with someone that agrees with you?Weak IP law is indeed a good thing. That doesn’t change that it’s a value judgment about the efficacy of those laws.If you wanted to effectively communicate laws that aren’t meant to be strict, and thus are doing what they’re meant to, it would be confusing for a reader if you used “weak”, rather than something like “lenient” or “permissive” or “open”.Anyway, semantics about how the term is being used is indeed the source of miscommunication. Now that I know what you mean, I agree that 5e has light exploration and social rules. I don’t agree with your statements that this means D&D 5e doesn’t do social or exploration gameplay as well as games with very codified mechanics for those gameplay aspects.</blockquote>