Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 8268272" data-attributes="member: 22779">Funny that we're supposed to take you at your word, no questions asked when you claim that you CAN do X in D&D and do it easily, to the point where suggesting another system is somehow off limits, but, when I claim that I (ME, not you, not anyone else, ME) CAN'T do X in D&D, I must somehow "prove" that I couldn't do it and suggest that yeah, another system would be better, or that, since I've tried to do it for years and failed and never seen any successful attempt at doing it over the years, I consider it something that D&D can't do, that's "offensive".I mean, I've given two examples in this thread - company scale combat and low magic - that I've tried to do repeatedly for years and it's failed every time.  I've looked at all sorts of rules to bolt on and it's still failed.  So, yeah, if anyone asks me how to do these two things in 5e, I'm going to say that 5e doesn't do them worth a damn and you'd be far better off looking to other systems that CAN do these things out of the box.If you find that offensive somehow, that's more on you to be honest.  You're dismissive of other people's experience while insisting that your experience must be taken into consideration.  It's elitist and incredibly arrogant.</blockquote>