Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 8268435" data-attributes="member: 22779">So, when someone says, Hey, instead of trying to use 5e for this, try, Game XYZ, that's offensive and bad.But, if someone says, "Hey, I tried to do that.  It didn't work for me.  Try game XYZ" that's perfectly fine?IOW, you insist that people somehow "prove" their experience to you.  They can't just say, "Hey, play BitD" but, they have to be somehow qualified to make that suggestion?  I mean, I went through EXTENSIVELY why the naval campaign rules in 5e don't work.  You completely ignored it, to nitpick minor details in another post about low magic campaigns, where your advice amounts to, "Don't try another system, but, rather, hope that you can find stuff on DM's Guild that will work".  Because that's so different.  <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm    :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" /> Not only do you ignore my point, but, you expressly asked Lanefan why he found lacking in the GoS naval rules. Basically, this is just an exercise in self congratulations.  You want all of us to give you a nice hearty pat on the head for telling off all those nasty folks that actually try other systems and have the temerity to suggest that they might be a better solution for you.</blockquote>