Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 8268811" data-attributes="member: 6704184">That is a great post. If I was trying to play Blades but wanted to do a thing that I knew Dogs did that Blades doesn’t natively do, as well, I’d be on much better footing to solve that situation after reading that. That is pretty much the opposite of thread replies that inspired the OP. Yeah it’s really a matter of what is more work, or perhaps more accurately what is more tedious work for you, between modding a system and learning a new system.    A thing that I think may have helped had I included it in the OP. IMO, it is inherently rude, crappy behavior, to come into a thread with a clear premise and goal, and tell the OP that they’re wrong for having the stated goal. (Barring moral issues, etc)I often make threads about a new class, subclass, houserule, feat, etc, that I’m building. There is always at least one reply telling me, as if I’ve never cracked open the PHB before, that some subclass or MC build or whatever “does this already”. Often I’ve already stated in the OP why that exact option is unsatisfying for me and/or the players I’m building the option for.    I don’t understand how anyone could possibly view this as normal, healthy, socially acceptable, behavior.</blockquote>