Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D compared to Bespoke Genre TTRPGs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 8268920" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>And one more thought [USER=83242]@dave2008[/USER].</p><p></p><p>First, I'm really sorry. I was incredibly rude. Thank you for your suggestions. They are actually very good suggestions and they most certainly would work.</p><p></p><p>However, in the context of this thread, I'm not sure that they are particularly "easy". After all, if I was to run a low magic D&D game again, I would use 4e, Martial only. PHB only actually. Right there, I've got four complete classes - ranger, fighter, rogue, warlord, which cover all the roles except controller, which, frankly, isn't really needed anyway. A five person party of 2 fighters, a ranger, rogue and warlord would work perfectly fine.</p><p></p><p>That gives me all the tactical depth I want in combat. I don't need any supplements and I know that it will function perfectly fine. Heck, if I wanted to be really good, I could simply add the Inherent Bonuses rule and I'm done. To me, that's about as simple as it comes. </p><p></p><p>Or, rather, I find that a far more simple solution than cherry pick material from four different supplements which still leaves me without the tactical depth in combat that I want - even with feats, you cannot make an area attack for example with a non-magic character, so my "sweep sand into their eyes to blind them still doesn't work in 5e without making up a ruling at the time - and quite possibly has all sorts of knock on issues like healing and whatnot.</p><p></p><p>So, yeah, if someone asked, "How can I do low magic in my 5e game?" my first response is always going to be, "Don't. It really doesn't work worth a damn. 5e is set up to be an extremely high magic game with spells and spell effects being used every single round and in every single combat. You'd be far better to use 4e instead."</p><p></p><p>I'm still not seeing how that is rude or offensive.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 8268920, member: 22779"] And one more thought [USER=83242]@dave2008[/USER]. First, I'm really sorry. I was incredibly rude. Thank you for your suggestions. They are actually very good suggestions and they most certainly would work. However, in the context of this thread, I'm not sure that they are particularly "easy". After all, if I was to run a low magic D&D game again, I would use 4e, Martial only. PHB only actually. Right there, I've got four complete classes - ranger, fighter, rogue, warlord, which cover all the roles except controller, which, frankly, isn't really needed anyway. A five person party of 2 fighters, a ranger, rogue and warlord would work perfectly fine. That gives me all the tactical depth I want in combat. I don't need any supplements and I know that it will function perfectly fine. Heck, if I wanted to be really good, I could simply add the Inherent Bonuses rule and I'm done. To me, that's about as simple as it comes. Or, rather, I find that a far more simple solution than cherry pick material from four different supplements which still leaves me without the tactical depth in combat that I want - even with feats, you cannot make an area attack for example with a non-magic character, so my "sweep sand into their eyes to blind them still doesn't work in 5e without making up a ruling at the time - and quite possibly has all sorts of knock on issues like healing and whatnot. So, yeah, if someone asked, "How can I do low magic in my 5e game?" my first response is always going to be, "Don't. It really doesn't work worth a damn. 5e is set up to be an extremely high magic game with spells and spell effects being used every single round and in every single combat. You'd be far better to use 4e instead." I'm still not seeing how that is rude or offensive. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D compared to Bespoke Genre TTRPGs
Top