Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 8272974" data-attributes="member: 82106">lol! You're welcome <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> I get you. I just mean, we don't know much about what people are playing. Maybe roll20 would be a better way to check that, but that's only another idea. I doubt there's any way to really know what is popular overall.I don't actually have a problem with the d20. I think it is OK as long as it isn't coupled too much with straight bonuses. In my table game (HoML) we have a straight up rule, there is only (dis)Advantage, nothing else. Any situation that isn't substantial enough to warrant that, is too trivial to adjust on. That really fixes any problems, and overall speeds play too.Oh, I don't disagree. What we would really need is not just sales figures, but customer satisfaction, or some proxy for it like replay value. Again, this might mean roll20 stats would be a good set to look at, but they may be biased towards certain types of games, I'm not sure. Some people also play in other online forums, so certain games may be more represented in some vs others, etc.</blockquote>