Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D compared to Bespoke Genre TTRPGs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 8273016" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>There's a sentiment/theory that all the trivial stuff about the Ancient Red Dragon matters, because that is all fodder for, basically, CAW! So, the fact (at least asserted by the post you responded to) that 4e cannot handle an Ancient Red Dragon forging a document to trick the PCs into an ambush is a big problem. That is if it cannot handle it straight up by applying the stat block and the skill rules and assuming that the dragon needs to make checks at DCs in the same fashion as a PC would. </p><p></p><p>And you know what I will say next, this is all a reflection of the basic core assumption being made by all 'process game' adherents, which is the core game assumptions that were established by Gary in 1973 in Greyhawk where he was an opponent and a referee and everything was a wargame like test of skill. It was logical, it made sense. The dragon was equivalent to a PC because they were all 'pogs' in a game where the DM was simply playing his side to give the players a challenge. The rules have to produce cognizable results in this model too, because there isn't any resolution framework beyond simple checks (of some sort). So, for the players to reason about the game and their odds, they must be able to think "well, how possible is it, fictionally, for the dragon to forge this document." and then the actual mechanics have to deliver a similar range of results! </p><p></p><p>None of this is relevant to the type of 4e you and I will run where the rules reference informing the fiction and a dragon and a PC are entirely different things. I simply imagine this would be cool for a dragon to do, and set a DC for the PCs to see through it, based on appropriate DCs for their level. I might integrate it into an SC, but either way I don't need mechanics for Dragons forging documents. Though I am not sure why it was stated that such don't exist or are unworkable. 4e retains enough of previous edition baggage that it DOES put skill bonuses into stat blocks. I guess maybe the complaint was they are too low? Perhaps. If so, you can always assume some training/magic/power which improves the outcome, or that the Dragon has a forger on staff (some otherwise irrelevant hireling probably).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 8273016, member: 82106"] There's a sentiment/theory that all the trivial stuff about the Ancient Red Dragon matters, because that is all fodder for, basically, CAW! So, the fact (at least asserted by the post you responded to) that 4e cannot handle an Ancient Red Dragon forging a document to trick the PCs into an ambush is a big problem. That is if it cannot handle it straight up by applying the stat block and the skill rules and assuming that the dragon needs to make checks at DCs in the same fashion as a PC would. And you know what I will say next, this is all a reflection of the basic core assumption being made by all 'process game' adherents, which is the core game assumptions that were established by Gary in 1973 in Greyhawk where he was an opponent and a referee and everything was a wargame like test of skill. It was logical, it made sense. The dragon was equivalent to a PC because they were all 'pogs' in a game where the DM was simply playing his side to give the players a challenge. The rules have to produce cognizable results in this model too, because there isn't any resolution framework beyond simple checks (of some sort). So, for the players to reason about the game and their odds, they must be able to think "well, how possible is it, fictionally, for the dragon to forge this document." and then the actual mechanics have to deliver a similar range of results! None of this is relevant to the type of 4e you and I will run where the rules reference informing the fiction and a dragon and a PC are entirely different things. I simply imagine this would be cool for a dragon to do, and set a DC for the PCs to see through it, based on appropriate DCs for their level. I might integrate it into an SC, but either way I don't need mechanics for Dragons forging documents. Though I am not sure why it was stated that such don't exist or are unworkable. 4e retains enough of previous edition baggage that it DOES put skill bonuses into stat blocks. I guess maybe the complaint was they are too low? Perhaps. If so, you can always assume some training/magic/power which improves the outcome, or that the Dragon has a forger on staff (some otherwise irrelevant hireling probably). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D compared to Bespoke Genre TTRPGs
Top