Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D compared to Bespoke Genre TTRPGs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 8275181" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Lets not get too focused on just one type of scenario and basically one skill. </p><p></p><p>I think it is safe to say that there are different sorts of scenarios and different skills which are more or less vulnerable to this. Physical type "test of skill" type skills clearly fall into the category of 'vulnerable to failure generating a complete mission fail'. Those kind of failures are most often and most naturally seen as things like falling, dropping something, making noise, being spotted, etc. Some may, in some situations, color as "you tried, you failed, zero progress" which could be blocking, or not only if some provision was made to go some alternate way (magic often being the alternate, though letting the next best bonus PC try is a solid option). </p><p></p><p>When you get into knowledge skills then you have a bit different set of scenarios. They're much more naturally going to lead to something akin to FF. You make the Investigation check, you might just not find any clue and be blocked, and I'd say this is ONE common scenario, but the other is you simply have to proceed with less information. You don't know if there's a back entrance to the dragon's lair, oh well... </p><p></p><p>Then there are the ones that typically gain you advantages of some sort, like maybe you want to build a trap, you might fail, OK you just gotta live with that. </p><p></p><p>Now, any of these could turn out to be catastrophic if your scenario depends 100% on it, or at least blocking. It sure would be much nicer if the system would contextualize these checks in such a way that the narrative naturally progressed in a you're in some more trouble than before kind of way. That is ALWAYS going to be the technique that gets you the best results, overall, except in a very very small set of cases. I don't buy that people are getting 'freedom' by not having a system that produces successful games. IMHO if you go back to all really successful groups and campaigns, you will find these techniques, in some fashion, made the table process work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 8275181, member: 82106"] Lets not get too focused on just one type of scenario and basically one skill. I think it is safe to say that there are different sorts of scenarios and different skills which are more or less vulnerable to this. Physical type "test of skill" type skills clearly fall into the category of 'vulnerable to failure generating a complete mission fail'. Those kind of failures are most often and most naturally seen as things like falling, dropping something, making noise, being spotted, etc. Some may, in some situations, color as "you tried, you failed, zero progress" which could be blocking, or not only if some provision was made to go some alternate way (magic often being the alternate, though letting the next best bonus PC try is a solid option). When you get into knowledge skills then you have a bit different set of scenarios. They're much more naturally going to lead to something akin to FF. You make the Investigation check, you might just not find any clue and be blocked, and I'd say this is ONE common scenario, but the other is you simply have to proceed with less information. You don't know if there's a back entrance to the dragon's lair, oh well... Then there are the ones that typically gain you advantages of some sort, like maybe you want to build a trap, you might fail, OK you just gotta live with that. Now, any of these could turn out to be catastrophic if your scenario depends 100% on it, or at least blocking. It sure would be much nicer if the system would contextualize these checks in such a way that the narrative naturally progressed in a you're in some more trouble than before kind of way. That is ALWAYS going to be the technique that gets you the best results, overall, except in a very very small set of cases. I don't buy that people are getting 'freedom' by not having a system that produces successful games. IMHO if you go back to all really successful groups and campaigns, you will find these techniques, in some fashion, made the table process work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D compared to Bespoke Genre TTRPGs
Top