Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 6289259" data-attributes="member: 7635"><p>It worked well for what it was supposed to be: a vague setting implied in the core rules to replace generic monikers (God of the Sun/Pelor, Empire of tieflings/Bal Turrath) much like how Greyhawk is implied throughout AD&D 1e's core rules and Mystara is implied in BECMI's box sets. The major difference is that Greyhawk has a proper map, dozens of supplements, and a defined timeline and history. So does Mystara. Nerath does not. Its completely possible (even if financially impractical) to create a setting sourcebook that could detail those two worlds, but Nerath would have a LOT of blank area to fill. If Next was using an implied setting, I could see Nerath working again. But since they are going setting neutral/Realms default, I don't see a point to Nerath as a major amount of work would need to be done to fill in the gaps.</p></blockquote><p></p>