Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Creator Summit--VTT & One D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8984103" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Don't have much to say in response to the overall stuff (no surprise there hopefully) but given I was "on the ground" for this one I can give a bit of context.</p><p></p><p>They're called Portraits, and originally they were just a personal thing (other players could only see them by actively and directly seeking them out.) Then, they were shown at the start of the new small-group PVP content introduced with Endwalker--and there wasn't a way to turn them off at the time. I, personally, don't mind the ones that are "look at my butt!" or the like, as those are frankly quite tame. The ones I <em>did not</em> appreciate were those that made it actually look like a guy masturbating on camera (IIRC, it involved a very careful camera angle and a wooden fishing pole), or the one that made it look like women providing, ahem, <em>oral stimulation</em> to a partner. Given there was at the time <em>no way</em> to avoid seeing these things if you did PVP, these ones that were (as you say) astonishing faux-filth were a line I wasn't comfortable with people crossing. But there was, for a little while, some <em>real big salt</em> about the decision.</p><p></p><p>Overall, erring on the side of prudish may have been for the best. Portraits are now also shown at the start of <em>every combat instance</em>. There is now the ability to opt out of seeing them, but...well, you have to opt out, not opt in. I've quite liked the portrait system overall though, it gives more personality and expression.</p><p></p><p>Ultimately, though, you're quite right that the portraits thing was a tempest in a teapot. As has been the case with other things, like when Square said, "Yeah uh...that stuff we've been saying about how mods aren't okay? <em>We really meant it guys, you actually can get banned for it.</em>" Oh, the hue and cry from folks suddenly TERRIFIED that Square would take away their accounts for no reason whatsoever! ...only for it to fizzle out two weeks later when everyone calmed down and actually understood that <em>nothing had changed</em>, Square was just <em>reminding</em> people of the policies it was already enforcing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 8984103, member: 6790260"] Don't have much to say in response to the overall stuff (no surprise there hopefully) but given I was "on the ground" for this one I can give a bit of context. They're called Portraits, and originally they were just a personal thing (other players could only see them by actively and directly seeking them out.) Then, they were shown at the start of the new small-group PVP content introduced with Endwalker--and there wasn't a way to turn them off at the time. I, personally, don't mind the ones that are "look at my butt!" or the like, as those are frankly quite tame. The ones I [I]did not[/I] appreciate were those that made it actually look like a guy masturbating on camera (IIRC, it involved a very careful camera angle and a wooden fishing pole), or the one that made it look like women providing, ahem, [I]oral stimulation[/I] to a partner. Given there was at the time [I]no way[/I] to avoid seeing these things if you did PVP, these ones that were (as you say) astonishing faux-filth were a line I wasn't comfortable with people crossing. But there was, for a little while, some [I]real big salt[/I] about the decision. Overall, erring on the side of prudish may have been for the best. Portraits are now also shown at the start of [I]every combat instance[/I]. There is now the ability to opt out of seeing them, but...well, you have to opt out, not opt in. I've quite liked the portrait system overall though, it gives more personality and expression. Ultimately, though, you're quite right that the portraits thing was a tempest in a teapot. As has been the case with other things, like when Square said, "Yeah uh...that stuff we've been saying about how mods aren't okay? [I]We really meant it guys, you actually can get banned for it.[/I]" Oh, the hue and cry from folks suddenly TERRIFIED that Square would take away their accounts for no reason whatsoever! ...only for it to fizzle out two weeks later when everyone calmed down and actually understood that [I]nothing had changed[/I], Square was just [I]reminding[/I] people of the policies it was already enforcing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Creator Summit--VTT & One D&D
Top