Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Debuts Playtest for Psion Class
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GarrettKP" data-source="post: 9671284" data-attributes="member: 6811472"><p>You thinking this and it being true about the rules aren’t the same thing. Nothing about any of those skills work with identifying a spell, which are rules laid out in Xanathar’s. </p><p></p><p>In Xanathar’s, the rules clearly say people can perceive the casting of a spell only if it has a Verbal, Somatic, or Material component. If you remove all three, you don’t have a way of being identified as casting a spell. </p><p></p><p>As for what the spell is or does, the rules also cover this. In the same section, it states you must use a reaction to make an Arcana check (not Perception or Insight or Investigation) to identify what spell is being cast. </p><p></p><p>That’s the rules. And before you say “Xanathar’s is old and not 2024,” the 2024 PHB says this about perceiving a spell:</p><p></p><p>“<strong><em>Awareness of Being Targeted.</em></strong> Unless a spell has a perceptible effect, a creature doesn’t know it was targeted by the spell. An effect like lightning is obvious, but a more subtle effect, such as an attempt to read thoughts, goes unnoticed unless a spell’s description says otherwise.”</p><p></p><p>And the only mention of identifying a spell outside the identify spell is a sidebar in the PHB that says you have to take the study action to make an Arcana check to identify a “non-instantaneous” spell and nothing about instant spells. So the Xanathar’s rules are still the most comprehensive we have. </p><p></p><p>Just because you don’t agree with the rules doesn’t change them. Targets of spells don’t know they are targets until the spell is obvious or its description says otherwise.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GarrettKP, post: 9671284, member: 6811472"] You thinking this and it being true about the rules aren’t the same thing. Nothing about any of those skills work with identifying a spell, which are rules laid out in Xanathar’s. In Xanathar’s, the rules clearly say people can perceive the casting of a spell only if it has a Verbal, Somatic, or Material component. If you remove all three, you don’t have a way of being identified as casting a spell. As for what the spell is or does, the rules also cover this. In the same section, it states you must use a reaction to make an Arcana check (not Perception or Insight or Investigation) to identify what spell is being cast. That’s the rules. And before you say “Xanathar’s is old and not 2024,” the 2024 PHB says this about perceiving a spell: “[B][I]Awareness of Being Targeted.[/I][/B] Unless a spell has a perceptible effect, a creature doesn’t know it was targeted by the spell. An effect like lightning is obvious, but a more subtle effect, such as an attempt to read thoughts, goes unnoticed unless a spell’s description says otherwise.” And the only mention of identifying a spell outside the identify spell is a sidebar in the PHB that says you have to take the study action to make an Arcana check to identify a “non-instantaneous” spell and nothing about instant spells. So the Xanathar’s rules are still the most comprehensive we have. Just because you don’t agree with the rules doesn’t change them. Targets of spells don’t know they are targets until the spell is obvious or its description says otherwise. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Debuts Playtest for Psion Class
Top