Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Debuts Playtest for Psion Class
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steampunkette" data-source="post: 9671608" data-attributes="member: 6796468"><p>After our previous arguments and the way they've gone down, where you often provide no argument or position -except- to try and argue that I and others are wrong, it truly feels like it's an almost automatic response.</p><p></p><p>It took me four posts of asking you to actually take a position of your own, all the while pulling one line out of my posts to discuss and argue, before you were willing to write a post about what you believe is actually going on.</p><p></p><p>I've never had to do that with Dave2008. He makes a post containing his opinion and entertains disagreements with it, or disagrees with other people's points, sure. But it never comes across as nay saying because he's got a position that I can read and go "Oh. Yeah. That makes sense." and then build a synthesis.</p><p></p><p>And once you did that, I went "Oh. Yeah. That makes sense." and then built a synthesis with your position, too.</p><p></p><p>Hypocrisy, however, would be holding you to a different standard than I hold Dave2008 apropos of nothing. Just "Because". No rhyme or reason to it.</p><p></p><p>But I don't do it for no reason. I do it because of my previous experiences with you.</p><p></p><p>Because I -don't- want to engage in another 20 pages of trying very hard to pin down your position on a topic while you take my posts line by line and dissect them to try and build a negative argument that amounts to "You're wrong." without any kind of attempt to explain what would be "Right".</p><p></p><p>I'm happy you're able to walk into our discussions clean slate. I'm glad you think I'm a first rate designer. And I do my best to try and understand your positions. I'd love it if you'd respond with a positive argument expressing your positions and what you think is "Right" rather than digging into what you think is "Wrong" more often.</p><p></p><p>I think you and I would have a lot more constructive discussions that way, because it allows for synthesis and comparison of position.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steampunkette, post: 9671608, member: 6796468"] After our previous arguments and the way they've gone down, where you often provide no argument or position -except- to try and argue that I and others are wrong, it truly feels like it's an almost automatic response. It took me four posts of asking you to actually take a position of your own, all the while pulling one line out of my posts to discuss and argue, before you were willing to write a post about what you believe is actually going on. I've never had to do that with Dave2008. He makes a post containing his opinion and entertains disagreements with it, or disagrees with other people's points, sure. But it never comes across as nay saying because he's got a position that I can read and go "Oh. Yeah. That makes sense." and then build a synthesis. And once you did that, I went "Oh. Yeah. That makes sense." and then built a synthesis with your position, too. Hypocrisy, however, would be holding you to a different standard than I hold Dave2008 apropos of nothing. Just "Because". No rhyme or reason to it. But I don't do it for no reason. I do it because of my previous experiences with you. Because I -don't- want to engage in another 20 pages of trying very hard to pin down your position on a topic while you take my posts line by line and dissect them to try and build a negative argument that amounts to "You're wrong." without any kind of attempt to explain what would be "Right". I'm happy you're able to walk into our discussions clean slate. I'm glad you think I'm a first rate designer. And I do my best to try and understand your positions. I'd love it if you'd respond with a positive argument expressing your positions and what you think is "Right" rather than digging into what you think is "Wrong" more often. I think you and I would have a lot more constructive discussions that way, because it allows for synthesis and comparison of position. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Debuts Playtest for Psion Class
Top