Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D doesn't need Evil
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Faolyn" data-source="post: 8407456" data-attributes="member: 6915329"><p>And that context makes the LE part unnecessary.</p><p></p><p></p><p><em>Does </em>that mean it? Lawful doesn't mean that one has to always keep their word or that they hate liars or rules-breakers. That's why devilish contracts are renowned for having loopholes, double-speak, and obsfucated phrasing. My own life experience with "LE" people (such as at my former workplace) suggests that they will do whatever the heck they want as long as it <em>looks </em>legitimate and can be justified to others, whereas "CE" people don't care about appearances.</p><p></p><p>About the only part here I agree with is being willing to hurt others for small infractions--but that's something that CE and NE people will do as well.</p><p></p><p>I looked up "what alignment is Darth Vader" and most people seem to think he's lawful evil--but he had no problem altering the deal (and telling others to pray that he doesn't altering it further). So, lying and rule-breaking right here. Has the internet lied to me?</p><p></p><p><em>And </em>I'd say that the information you provided is <em>barely </em>enough to RP her. How does she act to the PCs? Does she play along with them and then abandon or betray them later on? Will she work with the PCs completely, no matter their goal, because she's "lawful" or will she try to stop them if she disagrees with them? Does she insist that they kowtow to her? Will she accept one of the PCs as the leader, or betray them? How small of an infraction will she punish, and how far is she willing to go? See, the answers to these actually both provide useful information <em>and </em>replace the need for an alignment.</p><p></p><p>To me, that shows that since we seem to disagree strongly on two out of the three aspects of what you consider to be LE, I think this goes even further to show that alignment is not actually helpful. </p><p></p><p></p><p>As with the "punishing infractions" from above, most of this works just as well for NE, CE, and LN beings. If our mage (who presumably is intelligent) here was one of those alignments, she's still going to value power, she's still going to take not of who outranks who, she's still going to have a getaway plan whether she's lawful or not. A low-Int chaotic or neutral evil creature might be more gung-ho, but once you get to above-average stats, nah. The only real difference between alignments here is that after her sudden but inevitable betrayal, a LE person might view killing the party as a chore that needs doing and the CE person might have more fun with it. Maybe. And I still disagree that "lawful" means "honest," for reasons stated above.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Faolyn, post: 8407456, member: 6915329"] And that context makes the LE part unnecessary. [I]Does [/I]that mean it? Lawful doesn't mean that one has to always keep their word or that they hate liars or rules-breakers. That's why devilish contracts are renowned for having loopholes, double-speak, and obsfucated phrasing. My own life experience with "LE" people (such as at my former workplace) suggests that they will do whatever the heck they want as long as it [I]looks [/I]legitimate and can be justified to others, whereas "CE" people don't care about appearances. About the only part here I agree with is being willing to hurt others for small infractions--but that's something that CE and NE people will do as well. I looked up "what alignment is Darth Vader" and most people seem to think he's lawful evil--but he had no problem altering the deal (and telling others to pray that he doesn't altering it further). So, lying and rule-breaking right here. Has the internet lied to me? [I]And [/I]I'd say that the information you provided is [I]barely [/I]enough to RP her. How does she act to the PCs? Does she play along with them and then abandon or betray them later on? Will she work with the PCs completely, no matter their goal, because she's "lawful" or will she try to stop them if she disagrees with them? Does she insist that they kowtow to her? Will she accept one of the PCs as the leader, or betray them? How small of an infraction will she punish, and how far is she willing to go? See, the answers to these actually both provide useful information [I]and [/I]replace the need for an alignment. To me, that shows that since we seem to disagree strongly on two out of the three aspects of what you consider to be LE, I think this goes even further to show that alignment is not actually helpful. As with the "punishing infractions" from above, most of this works just as well for NE, CE, and LN beings. If our mage (who presumably is intelligent) here was one of those alignments, she's still going to value power, she's still going to take not of who outranks who, she's still going to have a getaway plan whether she's lawful or not. A low-Int chaotic or neutral evil creature might be more gung-ho, but once you get to above-average stats, nah. The only real difference between alignments here is that after her sudden but inevitable betrayal, a LE person might view killing the party as a chore that needs doing and the CE person might have more fun with it. Maybe. And I still disagree that "lawful" means "honest," for reasons stated above. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D doesn't need Evil
Top