Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 9469279" data-attributes="member: 7635">Those aren't synonyms. Winnable means the fight is within the characters' capacities to succeed. Fair means that all the information necessary to make a threat analysis is available and alternative means of overcoming it are available. Not every fight needs to be winnable, but EVERY one should be fair. A DM who creates unfair, unwinnable fights is at best naive and inexperienced (and will hopefully improve) and at worst a bully and a tyrant.A few examples:An ancient red dragon on a pile of coins who can be conversed with and bribed is fair, though the fight might not be winnable. A goblin with 1 million hit points isn't fair or winnable. The players have no way of knowing the DM has changed the rules and assume that the fight, based on all info the players have available, is winnable. The example golem with 2 HP is winnable, but not particularly fair. The DM did provide a way to avoid the encounter (the golem was slow and had a limited area) nor was the golem impeding any goal beyond "take its treasure" but there was no way to know the fight could be won except to play against PC knowledge (that flesh golems can be fought at that level) and reading the DMs mind. Bare in mind as someone who played Tomb of Horrors, I don't have a high opinion on deathtrap dungeons. Unfortunately, a lot of OS DMs don't understand that skilled play only works when there is enough to make informed choices, otherwise everything is a coin flip and you're back to throwing PCs into meat grinders because you can't determine threat level.</blockquote>

Verification