Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
D&D Family Problems (and the Impenetrability of the Game for Newbies)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6055758" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>I don't think anyone here would say there shouldn't be a basic component to the game. Mearls and company have stated that their hope was to make the game have a design possibility that apes BECMI as well as all the later editions... and I don't think anyone has taken them to task for that.</p><p></p><p>But the real issue here is: <em>How is the game presented to all of us? Both the basic and the advanced versions?</em></p><p></p><p>Whenever we see posts by folks who say that the Player's Handbook should present the basic "core" game (in order to make it easy to understand)... what seems to be what they are saying is that's ALL that would be presented (at least in the beginning of the Player's Handbook). The "basic" version of the game. You open up the Player's Handbook, and those first couple chapters on description and character creation would ONLY give you the aped BECMI rules. And that anything "complex" on top of that... things like Backgrounds, Specialties/Feats, Fighter Maneuvers, the non-four base classes, etc. etc. etc... would not actually appear until the "modules" start showing up (either in later chapters of the PH, or even in entirely different books.)</p><p></p><p>And that's where many of us are saying "Hold on."</p><p></p><p>I do not believe you need to have to completely strip out all the "complex modules" (if you'd even call Backgrounds "complex", although some people do) out of the opening chapters of the first Player's Handbook, and it'd be really silly if you did. You can present all the character creation guidelines in those first few chapters (basic and complex, modules and non) and just tell people (via sidebars and the like) how to play the game "basic" or "advanced" or anything in between by pulling those bits you want out of the group that gets given.</p><p></p><p>Yes... it <strong>would</strong> mean that someone who wanted to play just the basic core game would have to <em>skip over</em> the information on things like skills and feats within those first couple chapters of the PH in order to get to the core... but that is a much better <strong>organizational</strong> option than splitting all the information into two different sections, just so that the basic core gets separated from all the additional options you could add to it. Because quite frankly... the number of people who will want to play just the core without ANY options or modules is an exceedingly small percentage of the player pool I believe. At the very least... most players will want to use the extra "non-core" classes, races, and probably Backgrounds/skills. So making those folks flip to the back chapters of the book (or buy another book entirely) is doing no one any favors.</p><p></p><p>Now this being said... I also have always thought and said the game really should get released in two versions... the hardcover three-book model that covers the entire game (like usual) as well as the boxed set beginner's game. And with that one... yes, absolutely I think it'd be completely fine should that beginner's game include only the basic core-- the four base classes, the four base races, no Backgrounds, no Specialties, no Fighter Maneuvers except for Deadly Strike, no alternative casting mechanics, no Specialty Spells, condensed spell lists, and so on. That could be the place to have your base game. One specifically designed, laid out, and published in that format for those who want it.</p><p></p><p>But please don't demand the actual hardcover Player's Handbook use that format too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6055758, member: 7006"] I don't think anyone here would say there shouldn't be a basic component to the game. Mearls and company have stated that their hope was to make the game have a design possibility that apes BECMI as well as all the later editions... and I don't think anyone has taken them to task for that. But the real issue here is: [I]How is the game presented to all of us? Both the basic and the advanced versions?[/I] Whenever we see posts by folks who say that the Player's Handbook should present the basic "core" game (in order to make it easy to understand)... what seems to be what they are saying is that's ALL that would be presented (at least in the beginning of the Player's Handbook). The "basic" version of the game. You open up the Player's Handbook, and those first couple chapters on description and character creation would ONLY give you the aped BECMI rules. And that anything "complex" on top of that... things like Backgrounds, Specialties/Feats, Fighter Maneuvers, the non-four base classes, etc. etc. etc... would not actually appear until the "modules" start showing up (either in later chapters of the PH, or even in entirely different books.) And that's where many of us are saying "Hold on." I do not believe you need to have to completely strip out all the "complex modules" (if you'd even call Backgrounds "complex", although some people do) out of the opening chapters of the first Player's Handbook, and it'd be really silly if you did. You can present all the character creation guidelines in those first few chapters (basic and complex, modules and non) and just tell people (via sidebars and the like) how to play the game "basic" or "advanced" or anything in between by pulling those bits you want out of the group that gets given. Yes... it [B]would[/b] mean that someone who wanted to play just the basic core game would have to [I]skip over[/I] the information on things like skills and feats within those first couple chapters of the PH in order to get to the core... but that is a much better [B]organizational[/B] option than splitting all the information into two different sections, just so that the basic core gets separated from all the additional options you could add to it. Because quite frankly... the number of people who will want to play just the core without ANY options or modules is an exceedingly small percentage of the player pool I believe. At the very least... most players will want to use the extra "non-core" classes, races, and probably Backgrounds/skills. So making those folks flip to the back chapters of the book (or buy another book entirely) is doing no one any favors. Now this being said... I also have always thought and said the game really should get released in two versions... the hardcover three-book model that covers the entire game (like usual) as well as the boxed set beginner's game. And with that one... yes, absolutely I think it'd be completely fine should that beginner's game include only the basic core-- the four base classes, the four base races, no Backgrounds, no Specialties, no Fighter Maneuvers except for Deadly Strike, no alternative casting mechanics, no Specialty Spells, condensed spell lists, and so on. That could be the place to have your base game. One specifically designed, laid out, and published in that format for those who want it. But please don't demand the actual hardcover Player's Handbook use that format too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
D&D Family Problems (and the Impenetrability of the Game for Newbies)
Top