Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 4882048" data-attributes="member: 177">I think your hyperbole does you and your position a disservice.If people have been asking for the real opposite, a license that says, &quot;You may use content that WotC spent money and effort developing to make fun of and insult WotC,&quot; well, I think they are being unreasonable.If &quot;people&quot; aren't asking for that, then you are not clearly stating what they really are asking for.&nbsp; If you intend to speak for others, you should at least take a bit more care in representing them, hm?And be realistic.&nbsp; No license ever really clearly spells out exactly what may and may not be said, because language and human communication is too flexible.&nbsp; They'd have to cover every case anyone could ever think of, and the license would be unusable if they did so.Worry about the spirit and intent, not the letter of the law, especially for a fan site, which shouldn't be making you money or the like anyway.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 4882048, member: 177"] I think your hyperbole does you and your position a disservice. If people have been asking for the real opposite, a license that says, "You may use content that WotC spent money and effort developing to make fun of and insult WotC," well, I think they are being unreasonable. If "people" aren't asking for that, then you are not clearly stating what they really are asking for. If you intend to speak for others, you should at least take a bit more care in representing them, hm? And be realistic. No license ever really clearly spells out exactly what may and may not be said, because language and human communication is too flexible. They'd have to cover every case anyone could ever think of, and the license would be unusable if they did so. Worry about the spirit and intent, not the letter of the law, especially for a fan site, which shouldn't be making you money or the like anyway. [/QUOTE]

Verification