Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Hiring New Game Designer Months After Firing Many
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cergorach" data-source="post: 9442210" data-attributes="member: 725"><p>I don't see it as grievances, that's Dan Dillon territory... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> But when some of us see the unbased positivity of fanboyism rearing it's ugly head, that Lemmings (Oh no! Splat!) behavior isn't healthy and many just point out the mess WotC made the past 20 years. It's of course not all a mess, but it's a LOT of mess. There's a pattern in there with some very welcome exceptions. Expecting the exception to the rule with the next release/product is imho just misleading everyone. And don't get me wrong, it's not to convince the Lemmings that they are 'wrong', it's warning the rest of the folks that they should not get their hopes up and that the worst that could happen is that could happen is that they are pleasantly surprised when we're 'wrong'.</p><p></p><p>The issue many have is that they can't diverge the product from the people making it. I've been a fan of many of the 2e and 3e products, and I've collected the whole three editions (2e/3e/4e). I like some of the products, that doesn't my like/dislike of the people that made them and/or the company that made them. I don't really care about the people that made it, I don't know them. That changes when you have a conversation with them and <em>then </em>I can either like them, just accept them, or not. The faceless corporate entity of WotC/Hasbro I don't really care about, ever. I disliked WotC's practices with the introduction of MTG (Ante), I still loved the D&D 3e introduction and occasionally play Magic: Arena. But after 25 years of the WotC/Hasbro combo, I'm pretty certain what I expect from them is generally not positive, and when it is I'm presently surprised.</p><p></p><p>And some of us (me included) need to realize, is that we're getting old, and that maybe most of the products WotC is making aren't targeted (solely) at us. But that's also the issue I have with many WotC products they are trying to please everyone, and due to that not pleasing many. <em>shrugs</em> We could just live and let live, collect the positive folks in one thread and the negative ones in another, but that's imho not healthy. 'Healthy' discussion is positive, you might be tired of the negativety, we have our reasons, you have a different view, you have your reasons. Locking yourself up in your own bubble isn't healthy. The 'discussions' here give me insights into someone else's perspective, in many cases that doesn't change mine, but occasionally it does.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cergorach, post: 9442210, member: 725"] I don't see it as grievances, that's Dan Dillon territory... ;) But when some of us see the unbased positivity of fanboyism rearing it's ugly head, that Lemmings (Oh no! Splat!) behavior isn't healthy and many just point out the mess WotC made the past 20 years. It's of course not all a mess, but it's a LOT of mess. There's a pattern in there with some very welcome exceptions. Expecting the exception to the rule with the next release/product is imho just misleading everyone. And don't get me wrong, it's not to convince the Lemmings that they are 'wrong', it's warning the rest of the folks that they should not get their hopes up and that the worst that could happen is that could happen is that they are pleasantly surprised when we're 'wrong'. The issue many have is that they can't diverge the product from the people making it. I've been a fan of many of the 2e and 3e products, and I've collected the whole three editions (2e/3e/4e). I like some of the products, that doesn't my like/dislike of the people that made them and/or the company that made them. I don't really care about the people that made it, I don't know them. That changes when you have a conversation with them and [I]then [/I]I can either like them, just accept them, or not. The faceless corporate entity of WotC/Hasbro I don't really care about, ever. I disliked WotC's practices with the introduction of MTG (Ante), I still loved the D&D 3e introduction and occasionally play Magic: Arena. But after 25 years of the WotC/Hasbro combo, I'm pretty certain what I expect from them is generally not positive, and when it is I'm presently surprised. And some of us (me included) need to realize, is that we're getting old, and that maybe most of the products WotC is making aren't targeted (solely) at us. But that's also the issue I have with many WotC products they are trying to please everyone, and due to that not pleasing many. [I]shrugs[/I] We could just live and let live, collect the positive folks in one thread and the negative ones in another, but that's imho not healthy. 'Healthy' discussion is positive, you might be tired of the negativety, we have our reasons, you have a different view, you have your reasons. Locking yourself up in your own bubble isn't healthy. The 'discussions' here give me insights into someone else's perspective, in many cases that doesn't change mine, but occasionally it does. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Hiring New Game Designer Months After Firing Many
Top