Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Historian Ben Riggs says the OGL fiasco was Chris Cocks idea.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9412709" data-attributes="member: 6801228"><p>Idealized nothing. I know how impossible it is to moderate large-scale content like copyright strikes against animated TV shows. Trying to moderate the <strong><em>intent</em></strong> of text? It is literally impossible. They would have to prevent you from writing about the abilities you have on your legal character, just to prevent someone making a legal one. It would be a trash fire of such obvious magnitude that no one wanting a successful product would ever attempt it. It doesn't matter how much some suited president screams about revenue loss, the IT and software departments will tell them "This is not possible"</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because they can't TRACK it. To prevent someone from writing the Gloomstalker Ranger's ability into something else, they would need to not only track the word "psychic" but also "d8" and the context of every usage of those words or phrases. They would have to redact their OWN CLASSES to prevent it. And then ALSO prevent anyone from typing into a chat box those words.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So they will make custom spells and there is no issue.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because "less incentivized" is a mealy-mouthed nonsense stance. It seems to both mean that this will be so pervasive that the very foundational rules of creative play for every single person who plays in person with a core rulebook will be effected (eventually) and also so completely innocuous that it will not stop people from doing anything. So, they won't be stopped, they still can, but they won't, and so all the unlimited creative play of DnD will be strip mined from the game to serve the VTT as a soulless cash-grab.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, despite all the actual plays of people actually playing DnD and not being less incentivized to take any actions... none of it counts because it is only WoTC's VTT that will have this effect on the gaming community. Sorry, it is only WoTC's VTT that has the potential to maybe have this effect on the community where they might be less incentivized to take any possible creative action, which is the fundamental core of TTRPG play that it is sold on, and this gradual lessening of incentive will eventually erode the game until the core rulebooks are written to remove the idea that any action is possible, so that people will use the VTT which will have animations and colors.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9412709, member: 6801228"] Idealized nothing. I know how impossible it is to moderate large-scale content like copyright strikes against animated TV shows. Trying to moderate the [B][I]intent[/I][/B] of text? It is literally impossible. They would have to prevent you from writing about the abilities you have on your legal character, just to prevent someone making a legal one. It would be a trash fire of such obvious magnitude that no one wanting a successful product would ever attempt it. It doesn't matter how much some suited president screams about revenue loss, the IT and software departments will tell them "This is not possible" Because they can't TRACK it. To prevent someone from writing the Gloomstalker Ranger's ability into something else, they would need to not only track the word "psychic" but also "d8" and the context of every usage of those words or phrases. They would have to redact their OWN CLASSES to prevent it. And then ALSO prevent anyone from typing into a chat box those words. So they will make custom spells and there is no issue. Because "less incentivized" is a mealy-mouthed nonsense stance. It seems to both mean that this will be so pervasive that the very foundational rules of creative play for every single person who plays in person with a core rulebook will be effected (eventually) and also so completely innocuous that it will not stop people from doing anything. So, they won't be stopped, they still can, but they won't, and so all the unlimited creative play of DnD will be strip mined from the game to serve the VTT as a soulless cash-grab. So, despite all the actual plays of people actually playing DnD and not being less incentivized to take any actions... none of it counts because it is only WoTC's VTT that will have this effect on the gaming community. Sorry, it is only WoTC's VTT that has the potential to maybe have this effect on the community where they might be less incentivized to take any possible creative action, which is the fundamental core of TTRPG play that it is sold on, and this gradual lessening of incentive will eventually erode the game until the core rulebooks are written to remove the idea that any action is possible, so that people will use the VTT which will have animations and colors. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Historian Ben Riggs says the OGL fiasco was Chris Cocks idea.
Top