Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Historian Ben Riggs says the OGL fiasco was Chris Cocks idea.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 9413673" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p>Not based on what several other posters in this thread have put forward, with regards to the level of faith/trust shown to WotC (and, I should note, there's a difference between the company name and the brand name).</p><p></p><p>No one is saying quote <em>only</em> that line of text; just put that line in its own quote box. You've noted before how I break up quotes into several different boxes; take a cue from that.</p><p></p><p>While others will have spoken out about the possibility of it happening before it even begins, mostly over a bunch of people who supposedly guaranteed us with their precognitive powers that it never would.</p><p></p><p>Truly the height of discourse right here. You've come a long way from complaining about potshots.</p><p></p><p>Because WotC is known for maintaining relationships with people who don't care for them.</p><p></p><p>Which just goes to show you that the issue is neither dead nor buried, since the effects of that fiasco on the industry continue to be felt to this day.</p><p></p><p>See above; WotC is quite willing to work with "influencers" who they think will influence things in the way they (WotC) wants.</p><p></p><p>That's literally the heart of the issue.</p><p></p><p>So that they can better control it. Seriously, how is that in contention in your mind? We know they want to monetize things, and see customers as a barrier to that. Not to mention all of the things they've done to try and bring the industry further under their sway. Control is everything to WotC right now.</p><p></p><p>"Getting more sales" is how they want to exercise the control they're looking for.</p><p></p><p>Ah, so now you're granting my earlier point about the consolidation of services (which is another aspect which differentiates WotC's VTT from others). Of course, you dodged the issue of the character sheets themselves being an aspect of monetization, so there's that too.</p><p></p><p>Of course they're going to be importable (notice again that you misunderstood what I said; funny how that keeps happening), it's just that they're not going to be using those as a tent pole around which to monetize things...at least, not that they've said. It's entirely possible that we'll see micro-transactions for pointless things like decorations on your virtual character sheet.</p><p></p><p>There's a difference between marketing-speak directed at the customers whom they think of as barriers between them and their money and things which they say to investors (and, for that matter, leaked comments that came out during the OGL scandal). But please, tell us more why corporate-approved puff pieces to the customers whom they seem to hold in disdain are trustworthy.</p><p></p><p>Nice job patting yourself on the back for being more savvy than everyone else. But otherwise, it's already been pointed out that not everyone will use the VTT. The question is if enough will for its presentation to start shaping expectations.</p><p></p><p>As an aside, do you mean the actual RvB (as in, buy it from the now-defunct Rooster Teeth)? Because if they want to do that, the window seems like it's closing fast (if it hasn't already).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 9413673, member: 8461"] Not based on what several other posters in this thread have put forward, with regards to the level of faith/trust shown to WotC (and, I should note, there's a difference between the company name and the brand name). No one is saying quote [i]only[/i] that line of text; just put that line in its own quote box. You've noted before how I break up quotes into several different boxes; take a cue from that. While others will have spoken out about the possibility of it happening before it even begins, mostly over a bunch of people who supposedly guaranteed us with their precognitive powers that it never would. Truly the height of discourse right here. You've come a long way from complaining about potshots. Because WotC is known for maintaining relationships with people who don't care for them. Which just goes to show you that the issue is neither dead nor buried, since the effects of that fiasco on the industry continue to be felt to this day. See above; WotC is quite willing to work with "influencers" who they think will influence things in the way they (WotC) wants. That's literally the heart of the issue. So that they can better control it. Seriously, how is that in contention in your mind? We know they want to monetize things, and see customers as a barrier to that. Not to mention all of the things they've done to try and bring the industry further under their sway. Control is everything to WotC right now. "Getting more sales" is how they want to exercise the control they're looking for. Ah, so now you're granting my earlier point about the consolidation of services (which is another aspect which differentiates WotC's VTT from others). Of course, you dodged the issue of the character sheets themselves being an aspect of monetization, so there's that too. Of course they're going to be importable (notice again that you misunderstood what I said; funny how that keeps happening), it's just that they're not going to be using those as a tent pole around which to monetize things...at least, not that they've said. It's entirely possible that we'll see micro-transactions for pointless things like decorations on your virtual character sheet. There's a difference between marketing-speak directed at the customers whom they think of as barriers between them and their money and things which they say to investors (and, for that matter, leaked comments that came out during the OGL scandal). But please, tell us more why corporate-approved puff pieces to the customers whom they seem to hold in disdain are trustworthy. Nice job patting yourself on the back for being more savvy than everyone else. But otherwise, it's already been pointed out that not everyone will use the VTT. The question is if enough will for its presentation to start shaping expectations. As an aside, do you mean the actual RvB (as in, buy it from the now-defunct Rooster Teeth)? Because if they want to do that, the window seems like it's closing fast (if it hasn't already). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Historian Ben Riggs says the OGL fiasco was Chris Cocks idea.
Top