Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 9413949" data-attributes="member: 8461">Oh, it's hilarious. Of course, if you've gone back and read the thread, you'd see how I've pointed out each and every time they've managed to somehow misrepresent what I've said, repeatedly and in great detail. Laugh riot, there.Except for all of the times that I've done that in the course of this thread, which for some reason you seem to have overlooked.Says the person who just yesterday made a post full of hostility and ridicule, not to mention is curiously unable to find any of the posts I made where my point was clarified. Seriously, do you not understand that if you want to complain about a standard not being met, you have to meet it yourself? I just thought that was understood.And yet it somehow slipped your mind that you wouldn't need to summarize if you had just gone back and read what I actually wrote. Why is it that clicking back just a few pages was too much work for you, I wonder? Why is it that despite your questions having been answered before you asked them, you managed to post a restatement that just so happened to get everything wrong?  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f914.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure    :unsure:"  data-smilie="24"data-shortname=":unsure:" />People have said, on this page of this thread, that they understand, they just disagree. To the point of having to come in and say how their favorite multinational corporation can do no wrong.Again, statements like this make it clear that you haven't read the thread.Says the guy who joined this particular conversation with a snarky comment about "I don't need to provide evidence. I don't have to," and then tried to insist that no, really, it wasn't facetiousness.Presuming that you're being serious here, which is giving you a great deal of credit after <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/d-d-historian-ben-riggs-says-the-ogl-fiasco-was-chris-cocks-idea.705526/post-9413608" target="_blank">this post</a> of yours, go read <a href="https://www.enworld.org/threads/d-d-historian-ben-riggs-says-the-ogl-fiasco-was-chris-cocks-idea.705526/post-9410408" target="_blank">post #331</a>, and then maybe post an explanation for how you so conveniently missed it the first time around.</blockquote>

Verification