Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Charlaquin" data-source="post: 8527885" data-attributes="member: 6779196">I don’t blame you. Twitter is a literal bullying machine.I agree! For an example of this in action, look at the changes made to Eberron and Dark Sun in 4e. 4e also had a multiverse meta-setting, and most of the changes made to those two settings were to make them conform better to the World Axis cosmology, which was part of the 4e multiverse.I think, due to some of the backlash to these sorts of changes during 4e, they’re taking a more cautious approach with 5e’s meta-setting. It took them this long to give us a peek at the underlying lore of the 5e multiverse, and they seem more willing to allow worlds like Eberron to retain their own cosmologies rather than forcing them to conform to the Great Wheel. But I think some amount of tweaking of the settings to conform to the assumptions of 5e’s multiverse will be inevitable, especially for the M:tG planes.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Charlaquin, post: 8527885, member: 6779196"] I don’t blame you. Twitter is a literal bullying machine. I agree! For an example of this in action, look at the changes made to Eberron and Dark Sun in 4e. 4e [I]also had[/I] a multiverse meta-setting, and most of the changes made to those two settings were to make them conform better to the World Axis cosmology, which was part of the 4e multiverse. I think, due to some of the backlash to these sorts of changes during 4e, they’re taking a more cautious approach with 5e’s meta-setting. It took them this long to give us a peek at the underlying lore of the 5e multiverse, and they seem more willing to allow worlds like Eberron to retain their own cosmologies rather than forcing them to conform to the Great Wheel. But I think some amount of tweaking of the settings to conform to the assumptions of 5e’s multiverse will be inevitable, especially for the M:tG planes. [/QUOTE]

Verification