Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 8539854" data-attributes="member: 6801228">Or it works more like what Paul Farquhar says. After all, there are multiple settings where the Feywild isn't a thing. It doesn't exist in Eberron, or Dragonlance, or Theros or Ravnica. So, either WoTC is doing something utterly terrible... or they are just presenting a single facet of the whole. I guess I just don't understand why, when presented with two different equally plausible explanations, you and others insist on taking the version that is the least charitable and the most upsetting.EDIT:Ah, never mind, it seems we have reached an understanding.//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////And yet you refer to a universe as &quot;milky way size&quot; Yet the Milky way is only a mere 201,000 light years compared to the 93,000,000,000 light years of the actual observable universe (which of course, the actual universe could be larger than the observed universe)So, you have already put forth a model that allows to a universe to be 462,686.56 times smaller than the actual universe. So, if your model allows for something to be over 450 THOUSAND times smaller, why can't it be another 201 thousand times smaller? What makes 200,000 the magic number? What are you basing your claims on? Other than vague &quot;I know science fiction better than you&quot; claims?You have already stated what to call a universe without stars, planets and galaxies? I haven't seen you make that statement, so would you mind repeating it? Also point #4 is meaningless noise. I don't care that we don't know that the Heat Death model is accurate, it is an accepted model and the question is based on that model. Refusing to answer the question because other models exist is just avoiding the question.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 8539854, member: 6801228"] Or it works more like what Paul Farquhar says. After all, there are multiple settings where the Feywild isn't a thing. It doesn't exist in Eberron, or Dragonlance, or Theros or Ravnica. So, either WoTC is doing something utterly terrible... or they are just presenting a single facet of the whole. I guess I just don't understand why, when presented with two different equally plausible explanations, you and others insist on taking the version that is the least charitable and the most upsetting. EDIT: Ah, never mind, it seems we have reached an understanding. ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// And yet you refer to a universe as "milky way size" Yet the Milky way is only a mere 201,000 light years compared to the 93,000,000,000 light years of the actual observable universe (which of course, the actual universe could be larger than the observed universe) So, you have already put forth a model that allows to a universe to be 462,686.56 times smaller than the actual universe. So, if your model allows for something to be over 450 THOUSAND times smaller, why can't it be another 201 thousand times smaller? What makes 200,000 the magic number? What are you basing your claims on? Other than vague "I know science fiction better than you" claims? You have already stated what to call a universe without stars, planets and galaxies? I haven't seen you make that statement, so would you mind repeating it? Also point #4 is meaningless noise. I don't care that we don't know that the Heat Death model is accurate, it is an accepted model and the question is based on that model. Refusing to answer the question because other models exist is just avoiding the question. [/QUOTE]

Verification