Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D lovers who hate Vancian magic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 5771118" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>I certainly don't hate Vancian casting, but, I wouldn't be sad to see it go. So, here's my list of reasons:</p><p></p><p>1. Vancian casting gives too much primacy to broad effects and makes specific effects too costly. IOW, if you have the choice between memorizing Fireball or Illusory Script, well, I'll bet dollars to donuts on which choice gets made. Spells with specific effects either get cast after a night's rest or get whacked on scrolls (depending on edition) while the typical spells nearly always get memorized. It makes magic very predictable.</p><p></p><p>2. It mirrors virtually no genre fiction. There's a reason it's called Vancian. Unfortunately, while I love Jack Vance, I am under no illusions as to how widely read he is. Basing the entire magic system off of a very obscure genre writer from a book that was out of print before I was even born isn't really speaking to anyone other than other big honking genre nerds like me. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></p><p></p><p>3. It's very, very hard to balance. Even after 30 years of development, we still are rejiggering spells and effects to keep them in line with each other. There's just too darn many discrete effects.</p><p></p><p>4. It's very discouraging to players who don't want to spend umpteen hours reading gaming books trying to figure out what they can do. Even a reasonably low level caster, say 7th level in 3e, could have 20 different spells in his spell book (and this is a pretty low estimate). That's an awful lot of crap to track. </p><p></p><p>5. Vancian casting makes for hodge-podge casters. This gets reined in a bit with specialist casters, but, by and large, you have core casters with a suite of effects that are all over the place - no theme, no unifying concept. They've got a little of this, and a little of that. It makes casters ... what's the right word? Mushy.</p><p></p><p>So, there, that's my 5 reasons for strongly disliking Vancian casting.</p><p></p><p>If I had my druthers, Vancian casters would be replaced by either sorcerer mechanics or the Shadow-caster mechanics from the 3.5 Tome of Magic. (With the mechanics cleaned up a bit.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 5771118, member: 22779"] I certainly don't hate Vancian casting, but, I wouldn't be sad to see it go. So, here's my list of reasons: 1. Vancian casting gives too much primacy to broad effects and makes specific effects too costly. IOW, if you have the choice between memorizing Fireball or Illusory Script, well, I'll bet dollars to donuts on which choice gets made. Spells with specific effects either get cast after a night's rest or get whacked on scrolls (depending on edition) while the typical spells nearly always get memorized. It makes magic very predictable. 2. It mirrors virtually no genre fiction. There's a reason it's called Vancian. Unfortunately, while I love Jack Vance, I am under no illusions as to how widely read he is. Basing the entire magic system off of a very obscure genre writer from a book that was out of print before I was even born isn't really speaking to anyone other than other big honking genre nerds like me. :D 3. It's very, very hard to balance. Even after 30 years of development, we still are rejiggering spells and effects to keep them in line with each other. There's just too darn many discrete effects. 4. It's very discouraging to players who don't want to spend umpteen hours reading gaming books trying to figure out what they can do. Even a reasonably low level caster, say 7th level in 3e, could have 20 different spells in his spell book (and this is a pretty low estimate). That's an awful lot of crap to track. 5. Vancian casting makes for hodge-podge casters. This gets reined in a bit with specialist casters, but, by and large, you have core casters with a suite of effects that are all over the place - no theme, no unifying concept. They've got a little of this, and a little of that. It makes casters ... what's the right word? Mushy. So, there, that's my 5 reasons for strongly disliking Vancian casting. If I had my druthers, Vancian casters would be replaced by either sorcerer mechanics or the Shadow-caster mechanics from the 3.5 Tome of Magic. (With the mechanics cleaned up a bit.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D lovers who hate Vancian magic
Top