Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D lovers who hate Vancian magic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 5783908" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>This is something you claim and that as far as I can tell <em>no one else</em> agrees with. It's not even close to simulationist for anything that bears any resemblance to the works of Jack Vance.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>By the time that a wizard has dozens of spells, he fears not a housecat in melee combat even without his spells. Besides which, the 'housecat problem' is a specific problem with hit dice based systems that is completely unrelated to whatever magic system we adopt and has separate solutions. So this is a total red herring.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I'll concede the point that Paksenarrion is a piece of D&D fiction as a reaction to bad paladins. And then point out that this makes it an exception that quite literally proves the rule. (I've never played Hommlet so missed that one). Paksenarrion was quite literally written with D&D books as research making it another demonstration that the stories that resemble the D&D rules are ... stories that use D&D rules as the underlying basis.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Reported.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>It would do <em>if "Vancian" casting had anything to do with the works of Jack Vance except taking one fraction of the work very much out of context.</em> A Vancian wizard can count the number of spells he has at any one time on his fingers. And the number he casts in a story <em>on the fingers of one hand</em>. A D&D wizard with that few spells is in imminent danger from a housecat.</p><p> </p><p>"Vancian" magic doesn't just mean rationed. As far as I know, <em>no one</em> calls spell point systems Vancian. It's fire <em>and forget </em>that's the critical aspect of Vancian magic. And the ability to completely reload your spells in a way that you can say "Today I'm an Evoker. Tomorrow I think I'll be an illusionist."</p><p> </p><p>Jack Vance's heroes are much more generally competent and consistent at the core and with a few stand out spells they need to decide on in advance. AEDU with the D being changed to Vancian preparation would be a superb match. Everything being Vancian for a class takes it a long way from Jack Vance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 5783908, member: 87792"] This is something you claim and that as far as I can tell [I]no one else[/I] agrees with. It's not even close to simulationist for anything that bears any resemblance to the works of Jack Vance. By the time that a wizard has dozens of spells, he fears not a housecat in melee combat even without his spells. Besides which, the 'housecat problem' is a specific problem with hit dice based systems that is completely unrelated to whatever magic system we adopt and has separate solutions. So this is a total red herring. I'll concede the point that Paksenarrion is a piece of D&D fiction as a reaction to bad paladins. And then point out that this makes it an exception that quite literally proves the rule. (I've never played Hommlet so missed that one). Paksenarrion was quite literally written with D&D books as research making it another demonstration that the stories that resemble the D&D rules are ... stories that use D&D rules as the underlying basis. Reported. It would do [I]if "Vancian" casting had anything to do with the works of Jack Vance except taking one fraction of the work very much out of context.[/I] A Vancian wizard can count the number of spells he has at any one time on his fingers. And the number he casts in a story [I]on the fingers of one hand[/I]. A D&D wizard with that few spells is in imminent danger from a housecat. "Vancian" magic doesn't just mean rationed. As far as I know, [I]no one[/I] calls spell point systems Vancian. It's fire [I]and forget [/I]that's the critical aspect of Vancian magic. And the ability to completely reload your spells in a way that you can say "Today I'm an Evoker. Tomorrow I think I'll be an illusionist." Jack Vance's heroes are much more generally competent and consistent at the core and with a few stand out spells they need to decide on in advance. AEDU with the D being changed to Vancian preparation would be a superb match. Everything being Vancian for a class takes it a long way from Jack Vance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D lovers who hate Vancian magic
Top