Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D Minis: What's missing most?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DamionW" data-source="post: 2719568" data-attributes="member: 18649"><p>You know, for the number of times this has been posted, it would be nice if WotC marketed a product that chose the first two instead of the latter two. It wouldn't even have to fall under the DnD Minis brand name to avoid offending the skirmisher/collector market. Call them "Dungeons and Dragons: The RPG. 1 inch scale props" for all I care. I don't need fifty variants of each humanoid race/class combination to be satisfied. I'd settle for 1 medium and 1 small race figure for each main class in the PHB, and a set of generic figures for each monster race. One "orc" figure, and possibly an "orc leader" figure to head up a warband. A simple humanoid "skeleton/zombie" figure which has a roughly humanoid shape with flesh on some parts and bones exposed on others. One generic "giant" figure.</p><p></p><p>You get the idea. I don't need fifty variations of "Orc from the Glittering Sword tribe" or "Excorcist of the Silver Flame" or "Arrowhawk, now in ELDER size!" to match every possible PrC or every monster from any source. I'll give up that third tenet of Merric's Law just to have some simple, reliable figures to purchase in order to play out battles for the RPG rather than collect and skirmish like a CCG. It would be in a product line like this where you could include stuff like scenery or spell effects because it has nothing to do with the skirmishing game but is useful to the RPG. Obviously those would only come later after the basic market of adventurers and monsters could be tested for market utility, but it would break away from the idea these are meant to be collectible.</p><p></p><p>I'd even settle for reduced detail and quality. You want to distinguish your Medium size fighter character from the guy next to you who's playing? Get some miniature paint and change his armor from silver colored to red colored, or go out and try and to get one of the collectible DnD Mini brand. However, don't deprive the basic DnD RPG DM from having a reliable product to populate his battlespace with just to make the only product line a collectible one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DamionW, post: 2719568, member: 18649"] You know, for the number of times this has been posted, it would be nice if WotC marketed a product that chose the first two instead of the latter two. It wouldn't even have to fall under the DnD Minis brand name to avoid offending the skirmisher/collector market. Call them "Dungeons and Dragons: The RPG. 1 inch scale props" for all I care. I don't need fifty variants of each humanoid race/class combination to be satisfied. I'd settle for 1 medium and 1 small race figure for each main class in the PHB, and a set of generic figures for each monster race. One "orc" figure, and possibly an "orc leader" figure to head up a warband. A simple humanoid "skeleton/zombie" figure which has a roughly humanoid shape with flesh on some parts and bones exposed on others. One generic "giant" figure. You get the idea. I don't need fifty variations of "Orc from the Glittering Sword tribe" or "Excorcist of the Silver Flame" or "Arrowhawk, now in ELDER size!" to match every possible PrC or every monster from any source. I'll give up that third tenet of Merric's Law just to have some simple, reliable figures to purchase in order to play out battles for the RPG rather than collect and skirmish like a CCG. It would be in a product line like this where you could include stuff like scenery or spell effects because it has nothing to do with the skirmishing game but is useful to the RPG. Obviously those would only come later after the basic market of adventurers and monsters could be tested for market utility, but it would break away from the idea these are meant to be collectible. I'd even settle for reduced detail and quality. You want to distinguish your Medium size fighter character from the guy next to you who's playing? Get some miniature paint and change his armor from silver colored to red colored, or go out and try and to get one of the collectible DnD Mini brand. However, don't deprive the basic DnD RPG DM from having a reliable product to populate his battlespace with just to make the only product line a collectible one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
D&D Minis: What's missing most?
Top