Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Echohawk" data-source="post: 3498119" data-attributes="member: 9849">I've just taken a look at these magazine, and I agree that the critters from #72 and the first article in #80 are officially D&amp;D creatures. However, the other articles aren't D&amp;D articles, and I don't think the creatures from those can really be counted as &quot;D&amp;D&quot; creatures. In fact, the first &quot;Movies on the Battlemat&quot; article listed specifies that these are d20 System statistics, rather than D&amp;D stats.I do realise that probably no-one else is too bothered by this rather pedantic distinction, but since I was busy indexing these anyway, I didn't think a note to this long-dormant thread would hurt.Also... I don't suppose anyone know which issue of the DC Dragonlance series that monster appeared in? Or am I going to have to hunt down and check the whole series...?&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Echohawk, post: 3498119, member: 9849"] I've just taken a look at these magazine, and I agree that the critters from #72 and the first article in #80 are officially D&D creatures. However, the other articles aren't D&D articles, and I don't think the creatures from those can really be counted as "D&D" creatures. In fact, the first "Movies on the Battlemat" article listed specifies that these are d20 System statistics, rather than D&D stats. I do realise that probably no-one else is too bothered by this rather pedantic distinction, but since I was busy indexing these anyway, I didn't think a note to this long-dormant thread would hurt. Also... I don't suppose anyone know [I]which[/I] issue of the DC Dragonlance series that monster appeared in? Or am I going to have to hunt down and check the whole series...? ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification