Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next Art Column: June! And July!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 5979598" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>My problem with that Klaus is that the genre purists start coming out of the woodwork and telling everyone how it's being done wrong. Drop a Tolkien bomb in any online discussion and you've pretty much Godwinned the thread as everyone and their mother who has spent many, many hours pouring over the minutia of Tolkien descends on the thread to "prove" how the LotR really is.</p><p></p><p>That and while there is nothing wrong with looking at the roots, I find that so many people stop there. Only REH Conan counts, because nothing else is "real" Conan, even if only a tiny fraction of Conan readers have actually read REH and are likely far more familiar with De Camp's version. Or, heck, even Robert Jordan's version. Or the various comic book versions. And then we spiral back down to purists vs anything and everything else.</p><p></p><p>I mean, look at the reactions to 3e and 4e art and all the "It's so ANNNIE MAYYYY!" threads that we waded through for years. As if we had to stop all D&D art with Erol Otis and Trampier. </p><p></p><p>Sure, look at the roots, but, with an eye on how people are going to react now, not how we reacted thirty years ago.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 5979598, member: 22779"] My problem with that Klaus is that the genre purists start coming out of the woodwork and telling everyone how it's being done wrong. Drop a Tolkien bomb in any online discussion and you've pretty much Godwinned the thread as everyone and their mother who has spent many, many hours pouring over the minutia of Tolkien descends on the thread to "prove" how the LotR really is. That and while there is nothing wrong with looking at the roots, I find that so many people stop there. Only REH Conan counts, because nothing else is "real" Conan, even if only a tiny fraction of Conan readers have actually read REH and are likely far more familiar with De Camp's version. Or, heck, even Robert Jordan's version. Or the various comic book versions. And then we spiral back down to purists vs anything and everything else. I mean, look at the reactions to 3e and 4e art and all the "It's so ANNNIE MAYYYY!" threads that we waded through for years. As if we had to stop all D&D art with Erol Otis and Trampier. Sure, look at the roots, but, with an eye on how people are going to react now, not how we reacted thirty years ago. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next Art Column: June! And July!
Top