Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next Blog: Tone and Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thaumaturge" data-source="post: 5895884" data-attributes="member: 1927"><p>That's an interesting theory, but <em>for me</em>, it puts too much intention into the acts of those who have Lawyered Rules.</p><p></p><p>You know, I actually think a significant part of the Rise of the Ruleslawyers, <em>at least in my circles</em>, is how the books changed. They went from often contradictory and vague tomes with an almost mystical feel about them to very clear and concise college textbooks style books. When <em>we </em>played with the first type of books, it was easier, often, to just left the DM say how it was than to search for a particular rule. In 3e and then 4e, the rule referencing was just so danged easy.</p><p></p><p>Also, I was an adult with a degree while reading the most recent two editions, as opposed to a youth with low attention span and middling reading skills. Still, I say lets blame or praise the books and, by proxy, the writers for my failings. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>To circle back to what you disagree with me about, though, I think the rules-vaguery I mentioned, <em>with my groups</em>, was a reminder the DM was arbiter. He had to be. As the rules become easier to reference, perhaps some additional reminders in the player-facing text would have pushed back against the Rise. Perhaps not. </p><p></p><p>As to those who are upset about the classification of races- this is how rules modularity looks. There will be things you don't like presented beside things you do. If you don't like some things, ignore them. Others will gain utility from such a rule or presentation, which is good for them. Know their eyes will occasionally have to have actual, visual contact with rules or presentations they dislike, but you prefer.</p><p></p><p>If really necessary, have an eyedropper of bleach near your rulebooks at all time, so the pain of seeing a racial rarity that doesn't align with your homebrew is short.</p><p></p><p>Thaumaturge.</p><p></p><p>Also, don't do the eyedropper thing.<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thaumaturge, post: 5895884, member: 1927"] That's an interesting theory, but [I]for me[/I], it puts too much intention into the acts of those who have Lawyered Rules. You know, I actually think a significant part of the Rise of the Ruleslawyers, [I]at least in my circles[/I], is how the books changed. They went from often contradictory and vague tomes with an almost mystical feel about them to very clear and concise college textbooks style books. When [I]we [/I]played with the first type of books, it was easier, often, to just left the DM say how it was than to search for a particular rule. In 3e and then 4e, the rule referencing was just so danged easy. Also, I was an adult with a degree while reading the most recent two editions, as opposed to a youth with low attention span and middling reading skills. Still, I say lets blame or praise the books and, by proxy, the writers for my failings. :) To circle back to what you disagree with me about, though, I think the rules-vaguery I mentioned, [I]with my groups[/I], was a reminder the DM was arbiter. He had to be. As the rules become easier to reference, perhaps some additional reminders in the player-facing text would have pushed back against the Rise. Perhaps not. As to those who are upset about the classification of races- this is how rules modularity looks. There will be things you don't like presented beside things you do. If you don't like some things, ignore them. Others will gain utility from such a rule or presentation, which is good for them. Know their eyes will occasionally have to have actual, visual contact with rules or presentations they dislike, but you prefer. If really necessary, have an eyedropper of bleach near your rulebooks at all time, so the pain of seeing a racial rarity that doesn't align with your homebrew is short. Thaumaturge. Also, don't do the eyedropper thing.;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
D&D Next Blog: Tone and Edition
Top